brnbrade

Re: Free Solid State/mechanical energy
« Reply #404 on: April 18, 2007, 17:12:24 »

hi all. Grin

this is my first post. sorry my bad English.

I will try to explain some consideration.
I do not want add or to place idea of Erfinder, but, the magnetism and electric energy are one e different only in the frequency.

How thus?

If to catch one magneto or bar of steel carbon and to pass a small chain in form of frequency and its polos to place bobbins connected in parallel, we obtain to extract to power forces.
It is the same principle of the magneto turning around the bobbin, but what it makes energy is how much the turn determines 60hz in cycles for second.
What he determines the generation of being able is the frequency and not it mechanic moviment.
Then I could say that to be able electric it is a question of magnetic frequency.
In the device of Erfinder, the magnetos are made use in perfect order of frequency between polos N and S in second octava.

Erfinder congratulations.
Its simple and obvious thought opens the doors for new and intriguing key to understand the universe and its functioning.


Re: Free Solid State/mechanical energy
« Reply #411 on: April 18, 2007, 22:04:04 »

Hi again.

I imagine that coils tesla was a high-voltage resonante to stimulate currentes in the circuit through high frequency(stress).

Tesla used this to generate its waves.
But the peoples think that he is for generating sparks.

The more stress more easy to break the substance.
I see a magneto as a powerful cell. He has all power there inside.
He has its state + and -. potential difference.
One impulse (High Voltage ressonant) opens the doors for a flow of power.

As Erfinder it says, magnetism and electric to power is one, requires only one initial kick.
The sources are infinite. It is enough to look at for the universe. It by itself works.

congratulations


Re: Free Solid State/mechanical energy
« Reply #414 on: April 18, 2007, 22:41:02 »

I am not wild, only crazy

I am not wild, only crazy As my father already said.
Everything is a thought.
Before materializing itself it is an electromagnetic wave of the thought.


Re: Free Solid State/mechanical energy
« Reply #426 on: April 19, 2007, 20:30:32 »

Hi all

1886 - Old motor rotating field AC


Another old generator


Re: Free Solid State/mechanical energy
« Reply #447 on: April 20, 2007, 23:16:28 »

Re: Free Solid State/mechanical energy
« Reply #446 on: April 20, 2007, 22:33:22 »

brnbrade,

I like you drawings, they are good. But what you have labeled as "secondarie" is really the primary (E). And your "primarie" coils are really the secondaries (F and G).

You know what, I over looked this! Has anyone else noticed how the secondaries (F) are wrapped around the primary (E)? The primary is at the bottom... how strange. Erfinder's circuit has the primary around the secondary, Tesla is doing the opposite. I wonder if it makes a difference?

Anyway, I'm off to bed. Later guys,
Charlie

Charlie_V

thank you for the patch.

I will redraw the graphs, before somebody gets confused.


Re: Free Solid State/mechanical energy
« Reply #450 on: April 21, 2007, 00:02:55 »

I redraw a pictures.


Re: Free Solid State/mechanical energy
« Reply #455 on: April 21, 2007, 15:14:29 »

Quote from: Charlie_V on April 21, 2007, 09:38:13

Good Job brnbrade, I like those pictures. What program did you use? Paintshop?

Hi Charlie_V.

No. Photoshop.

I put layers and rebuild the paths with the tools.

Sorry my poor english.
Not expressing my thoughts correctly.


Re: Free Solid State/mechanical energy
« Reply #459 on: April 21, 2007, 19:46:03 »

Hi there.

Well. + or - like this

1 - The Eddy currents induces the secondary.
2 - Secondarys looped in HV e HC.
3 - The devices basically is a transformer

Regards


Re: Free Solid State/mechanical energy
« Reply #463 on: April 21, 2007, 23:23:34 »

Demystified!

The tesla secrets were anything anything else less than high frequencies to create great static power!

Because?

Simple. Larger adhesion power and repulsion power.
Example: Try you to arrive close to a line of strength of high potency.!
Poor fellow, anger to fry and to be pulled with great strength.
The arrays of the reels are as a long one entrust coiled as only one.
Tesla was persisted in great potencies and frequencies.
He knew about that magnetic power.
It doesn't generate great currents, but he has the power of inducing them.
The arrays of the device is a transformer. That is:
With a little current 1/4 of the phase, it got a booster.

I know that I am annoying with that, more it excuses my terrible English. I hope understand.


Re: Free Solid State/mechanical energy
« Reply #464 on: April 22, 2007, 00:17:33 »

What tesla probably thought!

The current model is to generate of the font the great potentials and flux.
Tesla knew that the fonts were big and inexhaustible.
Of the mother earth the more far away from the stars of the universe.
The grid of energy distribution today, requests an expensive structure and of great maintenance costs.
Tesla knew how to improve this.
That was ignored by the sands of the time.
The intellectual people of the time weren the theory of the electrons and they didn't know deeply the magnetism observed by tesla.
Tesla knew of the magnetism of the magnetos and of the static of the high frequencies.
High frequencies that were able transmitted for electromagnetic waves and received by antennas.
Tesla wise to liberate the energy

No more for the moment.

Was forgetting.!

Really liberates the Free Energy.
Now my head this breeze for a new horizons.


Re: Free Solid State/mechanical energy
« Reply #467 on: April 23, 2007, 11:28:26 »

http://www.borderlands.com/dollardandtesla.htm


Re: Free Solid State/mechanical energy
« Reply #481 on: April 24, 2007, 18:42:16 »

Erfinder

Oh, yes.!

Chickens make eggs and eggs make more chickens.! Cheesy

Who did appear first ? Roll Eyes

The magnetism or Electricity? Here is the controversy hahaha. Undecided

Erfinder boy badly. Tongue

Please answer.


Re: Free Solid State/mechanical energy
« Reply #483 on: April 24, 2007, 20:28:01 »

Hello all!!!

How is it that a magnetic field can be transformed in a field of high (electrostatic) potential in a transformer without himself to be electrostatic?

Being like this, I can affirm that: a transformer magnetic Iron works equal as a not magnetic iron.
Is the difference, is one transformed by the origin strength and other it already possesses his origin even?
ERFinder that would like that he answered me, please.!

How does a magnetic flow line produce electricity?

Doesn't produce anything. They are work in way the if they alternate in the streams A.C., and they are direct + and - polarized in D.C. Magnetism and electricity are same thing. Or I am wrong.

What is the nature of the flow line?

AC. Pulsed Alternate etc... or A.D. static or polarized

So that to produce or to induce electric effects this should also be electric!

That made to remember of the pyramids of Egypt, with their sides of the faces gone back to the magnetic north pole of the earth.
They seem to be capturing a field that comes of there. I know, that is mysticism, more he reminded me something big.

Regards


Re: Free Solid State/mechanical energy
« Reply #492 on: April 25, 2007, 15:55:53 »

The solid state Tesla pump DC

An device of the static corrent pump


Re: Free Solid State/mechanical energy
« Reply #512 on: April 26, 2007, 18:07:26 »

Hi all

Look at this link. The good stuff.
http://etc.usf.edu/clipart/20100/20156/sepexcdynamo_20156.htm
Have many concept used in these devices.
Very, very simple to building.

By


Re: Free Solid State/mechanical energy
« Reply #517 on: April 26, 2007, 20:11:11 »

Peoples.

Those waves Sinusoidal 90º are used to push pull or to excite the powers.
As wet string and you pass the fingers to remove the liquid. That is important.
Waves of the strong sea play you for far.

They are as shock waves.
I didn't understand is: As H.V. Can he work in the place of inductive currents?
I see HV of the device as an pulsating of the high frequencies. He will reverberate as wave reflex!

With certainty it filters the waves and it impels again against.
Where does he work in that if the primary is power off?

I wait to have done understood inside of my thought.!

Regards


Re: Free Solid State/mechanical energy
« Reply #517 on: April 26, 2007, 20:11:11 »

Peoples.

Those waves Sinusoidal 90º are used to push pull or to excite the powers. As wet string and you pass the fingers to remove the liquid. That is important. Waves of the strong sea play you for far.

They are as shock waves.
I didn't understand is: As H.V. Can he work in the place of inductive currents? I see HV of the device as an pulsating of the high frequencies. He will reverberate as wave reflex!
With certainty it filters the waves and it impels again against.
Where does he work in that if the primary is power off?

I wait to have done understood inside of my thought.!

Regards


Re: Free Solid State/mechanical energy
« Reply #528 on: April 26, 2007, 23:18:10 »

Hi

2 links good

http://www.kz1300.com/ecklin/

http://www.mullerpower.com/index2.php


Re: Free Solid State/mechanical energy
« Reply #565 on: April 28, 2007, 23:38:01 »

Re: Free Solid State/mechanical energy
« Reply #564 on: April 28, 2007, 22:55:38 »

Hi All,

I need to rephrase my earlier statement slightly......

In summary there are two perspectives that can be applied to Tesla’s patent. Either vacuum on vacuum or stressfield on stressfield. I prefer vacuum on vacuum as I understand this well. It appears Erfinder prefers stressfield on stressfield.

So I shall start with a quote from barbosi------------
What is "pumped" in coils F, is "sucked" in coils G.

And a quote from myself---------
If we have a neutralised current (the neutralised armature coils) that is rotated fast as we have here in Tesla's patent. This then attracts (sucks) the neutralised ether in like a whirlpool would suck in all the water. This would compress the ether to a point where it must radiate (pumps) it out (expansion). This radiated out polarised current is transferred to the secondary (another vacuum that sucks & pumps) .

So if you put these two statements together you have a vacuum on vacuum.

Regards,

N.

Hi nat1971a

Great explanation! This much more in the path certain of the things.

Two questions that I still don't understand.
Are The vacuum formed in the equator lines of the coils? Which the lines flow between rotor and the secondary?

Regards

Re: Free Solid State/mechanical energy
« Reply #566 on: April 29, 2007, 00:36:20 »

Hi brnbrade ,

I shall try to explain as best I can. It is hard to think of things conceptually then explain it in relation to the patent. But I will try my best. So here goes....

The vacuum is created in the armature by its rotation.

The other vacumm is created by the combination of all the secondary coils as a whole unit by their very rough circular shape & velocity. i.e the closed secondary circuit. One must understand that it doesnt have to be a perfect circle to induce a vacuum or a whirlpool as I have described as an analogy. I believe in nature they are more elliptical in shape.

Regards,

N.

Re: Free Solid State/mechanical energy
« Reply #578 on: April 29, 2007, 21:01:25 »

Hi Erfinder

You mentioned that a magneto is an electrostatic element. Which is the strength that pushes the individual magnets outside of the magneto?
Does the flow run of the south pole for the north or of the mid for the sides?
Magnetism would be the source then of that everything, best saying a vacuum.
Vacuous, it would be a strength that sucks the positive things and it repels the negatives. Or it would be the opposite of that.!!
That vacuous one would be the main grid contained in every infinite of the universe. That duality + and - in the magneto it would be the Electrostatic and the vacuum the painting screen.
Each individual magnet that flows of that magneto would be the brushes where I drawing my powers.
Example: To alter the south stream and later the north in a rocking frequency would have an alternating current.
And does a direct continue strength how it would be then?
Thinking like this, could say that to infinite forms of composing a power.
Excuse my questions, but this painting in my mental screen, this wanting to flow of the magnetos.

I wanting incorporate Leonnardo D'vinc that exists in me.

regards


Post by BushWacker:

Re: HOPE Testing
« Reply #20 on: May 07, 2007, 08:15:08 AM »

Hello Guys,

I am attaching what I believe is going to be the final revision of the "HOPE for the Future" Construction, Assembly, and Basic Information for those who have the means and desire to experiment with this type of device. Please remember that despite my many attempts to clarify that I am making no claims as of yet that the HOPE Generator is a "Free Energy Technology" a number of people can't seem to get that through there heads. ......Sterling, are you seeing this?

There have also been a few folks who talk as though I am hopping up and down thinking that I'm going to power my car with this device......lol. Please understand that the reason that I am offering this information is because I believe this is a very interesting phenomenon, and I believe that we should be able to use this knowledge to take things to an entirely new level of development where we may very well be able to power our cars and/or homes with something like this. It will probably look considerable different than the original HOPE Unit/Generator but I predict that highly reactive piezo powders will be introduced to the mix and that there will likely be some changes in the shape of the cores in the future.

There is one person in this forum who despite the fact that he has really ticked me off at times eg; (FreedomFuel), he is right about a whole lot of things involving the reasons that the HOPE Generator does what it does. I believe that he is also right on the money with his insights on rotating magnetic fields. I would love to be able to afford to buy the materials necessary to take this research to the level that I believe it has the potential to be taken to but right now that doesn't look like its going to be possible. I can only HOPE that I have finally been understood on the reasons why I felt that I should post my findings on this forum. I also hope that people will stop telling others that I am claiming that the current HOPE Generator is a free energy device. It does appear to be according to the equipment that I have to measure the voltage and amperage but if all of the conventional meters are correct then why is that energy not able to light an incandecent bulb. It will create beautiful bluish-purple streamers throughout the inside of the incandecent bulbs, but only if one wire is used. It does nothing when both wires are hooked up.

A great many questions are going to be left unanswered until someone else with money and the proper tools to investigate everything properly will either take a look at what I already have developed or build their own and try to reproduce exactly what I have done so far.

Agape All,
Jim


Post by BushWacker:

Re: HOPE Testing
« Reply #21 on: May 11, 2007, 12:36:57 AM »

Hi Everyone,

Check the attached file for a schematic of how the Radio Shack "Mini Ampliefier" and "Miniature Audio Transformer" are connected to a HOPE Unit in order to create self tuning optimum feedback resonance for most builds. There have only been about 3 instances where certain HOPE Models generated higher AC potential without the miniature audio transformer. Therefore experimenters are advised to test their HOPE Units both with, and without the addition of the miniature audio transformer.

This is the safest method of do any initial testing with a HOPE Generator to get an idea of what a units conversion ratio's are like. However, remember that many times a HOPE Generators efficiency ratings will climb according to how much energy you feed it. I have built a numbr of models that when a certain critical saturation point was reached on the input, the conversion factors went beyond what anyone one believe unless they could see it for themselves. Also, with certain builds it has proven possible to connect a HOPE Unit with a secondary transformer. For each model where this has been the case a differing and somewhat novel set of connections had to be made with each unique unit. When just the right setup was found virtually any frequency could be used to generate a great deal of AC Potential, and some units actually generated 2000 to 3000 VAC with only moderate volume audio signals being used to induce such a reaction.
Until a few others start to take this research seriously though I am sure that I must sound as though I am blowing smoke up everyone's wazoo's..

Cheers All,

Jim


Re: Free Solid State/mechanical energy
« Reply #861 on: May 25, 2007, 22:03:06 »

Hi all. Cheesy

More discovered of ERFINDER.! It this disappeared.

Discovering more on tesla well clear so that let us can in moving them ahead.

I say: Tesla used high voltage in all its devices because?

Simple, to create electrecity a tension is basic.

It is the force that moves electric chains. A potential difference allows a flow. As in loading them of capacitors of tesla.

It made a polarization of loads to create a tension.

This tension allows to open the pipes current to flow it as in the water pipes.

This can be newness for did not you, more in such a way in a common magneto as in one cell, the basic one to create and to flow one current is to create a potential (tension).
This exactly a potential difference.
In the waves sine it is only possible with mechanical turn where they reach a minimum and a maximum between North Pole and south.
In cells is possible differences between used metals and acid the reactive elements type. Also for the capacitive elements as capacitors. As leiden Jar. Static power system. Oh!! Shocked

http://Regards



Re: Free Solid State/mechanical energy
« Reply #867 on: June 03, 2007, 16:27:41 »

Hi all

I have innovations.!

I Replication Daniel McFarland's patents using the concepts administered here and worked well.
overcame the expected.
Sorry I not to have pictures to illustrate the experiences.
For the initial kicks of power I used a battery of 12v 7A of motorcycle.
The exciting is a coil electro-magnet. chickens make more chickens Grin. It´s real

Regards


Re: Free Solid State/mechanical energy
« Reply #873 on: June 05, 2007, 20:55:35 »

Hello

My replication, about my point of view of the invention.


Re: HOPE Testing
« Reply #23 on: June 16, 2007, 11:29:42 PM »

BushWacker

I want to suggest improvements in the device HOPE gen.
It is known that, a high speaker is a coils and a magnetic ring! Ok, without innovations here.
But, it is used electric pulses to generate frequencies and to balance the speker... Wow! And if to do the opposite.
A trafo in that ring with fine primary wire and secondary fat thread.
Quite so, the high speaker is the inverse of a generator, but to the opposite that think, being a generator also.
As if it balances a coils inside of a magnetic field, it goes and it comes, and that everybody knows what happens.
Gen. Hope is good overunit, however with a difference the most promising of all.

Excuse my bad English.

Regards


Re: Proof of concept - perturbing a static magnetic field « Reply #61 on: 6/24/2007, 04:14:39 AM »

Hello all

This morning I played with resonant frequencies of my walkman in the ring tpu that I built.
I input whit 2 cells 1.5v, and collect 52v 1A in output.
When I decided to put a permanent magnetic ring in turn of the rings collectors and...
Amaze, the readings jumped for more than 250v. with two cell my reader was crazy.

I hope help

Regards


Re: Proof of concept - perturbing a static magnetic field
« Reply #63 on: Today at 05:06:29 AM »

Quote from: chrisC on Today at 04:30:58 AM @brnbrade

Great! Can you tell us a little bit more of your setup, circuit, current measurements and ring structure please? There is not enough information from your post to understand what we are supposed to understand? Thank you.

Regards
chrisC

Hi ChrisC,
My TPU comprise in 24 turns medium wire and 1000 turns more fine wire in parallel, mounted in pvc tube and isolated well isolated. I put permanent magneto ring in turn of the tpu and reader jumped as crazy above the 250v.

TKS


Re: Proof of concept - perturbing a static magnetic field
« Reply #66 on: Today at 05:37:38 AM »

chrisC

The initial reading was of 50v without the ring magnetic permenente. But, when I put the ring permenente the things left my understanding. The frequencies were of an old walkmam. The frequencies were of the sound that run of the station tuned in place.
Yes, a transformer, high speaker, the primary vibrating in magnetic field, secondary as collectors.

Tks


Re: Proof of concept - perturbing a static magnetic field
« Reply #67 on: Today at 05:50:26 AM »

Hi

I believe with more amper and faster and broad pulses the thing begins to be interesting.!
In it lives him.!

regards


Re: Proof of concept - perturbing a static magnetic field
« Reply #70 on: Today at 06:13:47 AM »

Hi

The permanent magnetic ring on the outside of the pvc tube. The station was FM stereo.
More thinks that is relevant.
Mine to think it is, the primary works as electromagnet of the pulses of the sound frequency.
A diode rectifier was put in the outlet of the walkman for not having tension return.

Tks


Re: Proof of concept - perturbing a static magnetic field « Reply #73 on: Today at 06:37:25 AM »

Quote from: chrisC on 6/24/2007, 06:19:37 AM

brnbrade :

I don't have a good drawing tool. Is it like this? What is the FM frequency?

chrisC

chrisC


brnbrade experiment_test setup
« Reply #79 on: Today at 10:45:02 AM »

Hi brnbrade,

Is this how your setup looked like?
Please confirm or post necessary changes.

73, Earl


Re: Proof of concept - perturbing a static magnetic field
« Reply #96 on: Today at 07:00:24 PM »

Hi btentzer

I make little moving demonstrate my experiment concept.

Tks

Crazy.wmv


Re: Proof of concept - perturbing a static magnetic field
« Reply #98 on: Today at 07:54:08 PM »

Quote from: Thedane on Today at 07:19:18 PM

Hi brnbrade,
Your video shows an analogue meter where the needle follows the music - and not much more.
(To me it also looks like you're taking the output from your stereo and channels it through a transformer - something that is NOT even close to unity.)
May I ask which concept it is that you're trying to show?

//TheDane

Yes. Here anything of more for the moment.
The one that I wanted to show as the sound waves balances.
That inside of the one of my device also scale.
And it is known that a magnetic field varying in the time generates energy.
How yes, so fast the primary ones to balance the secondary ones they collect more energy.
It is it that me leaning of that everything.

I'm generating AC into a series circuit, I'm then vibrating said circuit to and from a parallel one, and according to the DMM out comes these voltage spikes!

www.youtube.com

regards


Re: Proof of concept - perturbing a static magnetic field
« Reply #100 on: Today at 08:41:03 PM »

Re: Proof of concept - perturbing a static magnetic field
« Reply #99 on: Today at 08:15:11 PM »

Hi Brnbrade,

You are right. The voltage fluctuates with the beat oscillations of the station. I just finished hooking up stereo wires from a headphone output of an FM radio to a transformer. WAS NOT looking for OU, before everyone floods me! LOL

I noticed some weird things. At the bottom of the FM dial there was .001 readings, nothing there. I hit 101 on up and things looked better with readings between .8 mv and 1.2 volts. I then did a little mobius loop from outputs to inputs with diodes to input the feedback and got it up to between 6 and 7 volts. So the faster the pulse of this wave I think the more power will be generated in the proper circuit potential, with the correct frequencies. Also, as I adjusted the gain it had a direct affect on voltage output.

Remember what SM says about the TPU?
"You can begin to collect the current and dissipate it with no need for amplification because the signal source also becomes the feed for the power source and has the natural tendency to run with gain.

Brnbrade, what size pvc did you use to wrap your wire? We would like to try to repeat what you have done. Have you tried it again today?

btentzer

To begin with high big old speaker's magnet and pvc of 1/4 ".

tks


Re: The Brnbrade OverUnity Coil/TPU
« Reply #1 on: June 30, 2007, 23:39:03 »

Hi All

As I had promised would post my results.
Love or hate. If hey want replicate and any question will be answered.

Think about my device with closed looped.
Enjoy

Regards


Re: The Brnbrade OverUnity Coil/TPU
« Reply #13 on: Today at 01:43:29 »

Quote from: btentzer on Today at 01:04:27

Brn brades idea is to have several of these coils in a circle in ECD fashion.

Yes Bruce.

Exactly.

Four of those in the tpu. Hummmmm!!!
Now only amper readings and to see the proofs.
I have hope to be the remaining part of the secret of SM.

Ps. The boot this output of the capacitor and not of the cells


Re: The Brnbrade OverUnity Coil/TPU
« Reply #15 on: Today at 02:56:13 »

Quote from: bob.rennips on Today at 02:34:10

Hi Brnbrade,

Thanks for posting. I think you need to provide a detailed drawing of what wires are connected to what. The placement of the magnet. Where the poles are of the magnet are. Where the +ve. and -ve of the battary go. Whether the batteris are in series or parallel etc.

I really don't want to have another guessing game, SM pictures are quite enough!!
But in the last picture showing 250V the magnet does not appear to be part of the circuit ?

This circuit digrammer is quick and easy for drawing components and linking with wires: http://www.falstad.com/circuit/

Select Menu 'Circuits' - item -'Blank Circuits' to get going.
RIGHT CLICK to access all the components and wires.

Cheer, Bob

Hi Bob

I will make the diagrams as possible. Only that you have some wait.

Something to consider.

I will test 2 cap. eletrolitic of the output for input. Like this closed loop in the circuit. I will arrange a cicuit PWM with frequencies DC pulsed in input. The coils convert again for AC and reads the cap. eletrolitic again.


Re: The Brnbrade OverUnity Coil/TPU
« Reply #40 on: July 01, 2007, 19:13:33 »

Reply with quoteQuote
Quote from: gn0stik on July 01, 2007, 15:05:08

BTW, why not rectify and measure amps out on that analog meter? It has DC amps on it.

I will try this. Desire to rectify. Somebody can draw an outline for me...


Re: The Brnbrade OverUnity Coil/TPU
« Reply #46 on: July 01, 2007, 19:55:20 »

Quote from: supersam on July 01, 2007, 19:41:39

brnbrade,

regardless, of whether the bulb is a 40, 60, or 80 watt bulb, it liiks like you have enough power to charge your batteries!
lol
sam

60 watts 24V 2,5A


Re: The Brnbrade OverUnity Coil/TPU
« Reply #51 on: July 01, 2007, 20:44:34 »

Hi all

Somebody please can draw a schematic of as one mosfet could drain amper of the red wire.

Thank.


Re: The Brnbrade OverUnity Coil/TPU
« Reply #54 on: July 01, 2007, 21:03:24 »

Reply with quoteQuote
Quote from: hartiberlin on July 01, 2007, 20:51:10

Quote from: brnbrade on July 01, 2007, 20:44:34

Hi all

Somebody please can draw a schematic of as one mosfet could drain amper of the red wire.

Thank. Smiley
What do you mean by this Huh

Can you please post more pictures of your setup and let us know more data of it ?

How many turns have the coils ?

What is the core of the 2 rod coils made of ?

Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.

P.S: Please use
http://babelfish.altavista.com/
for translation if you can not post in english language, or post in yournative language over here and somebody else will translate.
Many thanks.

Hi Stefan

I draw the scheme of the my device this week.
I will do as possible.

I need scheme of the mosfets for drain the amps.

Regards


Re: The Brnbrade OverUnity Coil/TPU
« Reply #56 on: July 01, 2007, 21:08:08 »

Re: The Brnbrade OverUnity Coil/TPU
« Reply #55 on: July 01, 2007, 21:05:49 »

Well done brnbrade. The bulb brightness looks great -definately something happening here.

As requested here is a document about recitification for amp measurement.

http://www.faqs.org/docs/electric/Semi/SEMI_3.html

See about half way down - "full wave rectifying circuit" (bridge design)

You need 4 diodes for best result.

Or just use one diode, and double the measurement - this assumes the AC averages out to be symetrical over time.

The only item I'm unsure about is where the stereo connections are made.

Are you connecting the two positives but not the common negative ?

Hi bob

Tanks
I see the rectifying circuit

Regards


Re: The Brnbrade OverUnity Coil/TPU
« Reply #60 on: July 01, 2007, 21:23:12 »

Draining which amps?

Yes, will test the behavior of the mosfet in circuit. I will try in output the red wire of the device


Re: The Brnbrade OverUnity Coil/TPU
« Reply #64 on: July 01, 2007, 22:44:11 »

Re: The Brnbrade OverUnity Coil/TPU
« Reply #59 on: July 01, 2007, 21:16:38 »

@ Brnbrade Hang in there you are doing great!! Cheesy

@ Everyone

I did find out that the volume on the radio was set at 30%

It looks to me that the coils are wound over a plastic air core and then a nail is inserted into the center of each. Is this correct brnbrade?

Also, I think there is only the large speaker magnet that is seen. This is what he said last time on another thread. Is the large magnet the only one brnbrade?

Happy Days! Smiley
Bruce

Re: The Brnbrade OverUnity Coil/TPU
« Reply #63 on: July 01, 2007, 22:37:42 »

Hey all!

It would seem that our young friend has made some improvements to his coils since his post on EM's thread.

Here are some more accurate details of the present setup:
Is the primary and secondary wires wound on plastic or metal?
1. Core is steel or magnetic insulated for dieletric element.

Is that large round magnet the only magnet you have with the coils?
2. Yes.

Also I wanted to say, that like Otto, our young friend is a student of Erfinder.

Happy Days! Smiley
Bruce

My scheme


Re: The Brnbrade OverUnity Coil/TPU
« Reply #76 on: Today at 00:28:07 »

@ Jason and All

I asked brnbrade the same question and this was his answer:
Was it a stereo head phone jack you hooked to?

It was in the exit of the I radio. Probably him already this covered with earth and it turns off automatically when has return voltage.
The volume was 30% of 100%.
More thinks that is irrelevant, because a small charge for the battery work.

If so, where did you wire the ground of each channel?

No grounded

Cheers,
Bruce (In the picture the jumper cable looking things are to the radio, according to earlier pictures.)

Re: The Brnbrade Coil/Overunity?
« Reply #141 on: Today at 17:40:26 »

Hi all

No battery


Re: The Brnbrade Coil/Overunity?
« Reply #150 on: Today at 19:10:18 »

Quote from: jacob on Today at 18:34:59

And no magnet either it seems...

Does the oscillation eventually dies out (when the capacitor is fully discharged) or does it continues to run? On the second picture, the voltage looks very low, so I guess it is on its way to depletion.

Jacob

Yes, the load reads ouver the 50v and decrease slowly, and persist 15v to 16v


Re: The Brnbrade Coil/Overunity?
« Reply #153 on: Today at 19:19:20 »

I am testing all of the types possible of configurations. Attempts and mistakes. And in this it goes and it comes I saw strange things. The capacitors seem to hold the load for 12v to 16v. This dissipating energy.


Re: The Brnbrade Coil/Overunity?
« Reply #159 on: Today at 19:52:56 »

Lenz's law. Tesla magnetic diode.

This may all sound familiar to some but incase you are not aware. When the magnetic field from the coil expands another field is formed around the aluminum. Now you have two of these, cross connected and also consider that all four fields are displacing the terrestrial ambient field. When these four fields collapse the ambient field also collapses into the cores.

Starting up may be a problem if the two signals with just the right phase relationship are not known. Better to hit it with some random signal and see what happens?

I can't say if this is an example of useable free energy but it is certainly interesting.

Keep up the good work BrnBrade!

Re: The Brnbrade Coil/Overunity?
« Reply #160 on: Today at 20:00:42 »

Quote from: EMdevices on Today at 19:24:34

Good job brnbrade, keep experimenting Smiley

I noticed some weird stuff with my coils as well. I was getting a DC voltage, not AC, but it was Positive (+) sometimes when I energized, and at other times it was Negative (-).

These transformer configurations are sure weird. I will now try to replicate your setup exactly, with aluminum foil between the windings.

EM

EMdevices

Make the coils. You will prove for you same that works.


Re: The Brnbrade Coil/Overunity?
« Reply #162 on: July 02, 2007, 20:52:21 »

Hi all

I ask all that to want. Replicate and all can help that device develop. The friends that possess oscilloscope and tools readers advanced, can help in the walk.

Regards


Re: The Brnbrade Coil/Overunity?
« Reply #167 on: July 02, 2007, 21:39:49 »

Hi ,

How many turns of wire did you use ?

MacFarland mentions more wire more better the result.

In one posting was said 35 turns ?

In my device is 35 turns.
It can be more turns or less. I didn't play with this still.

Is this the big red wire ?

Thick red wire 35 turns.

How many turns does the fine wire have ?

Huh

Many thanks.


Re: The Brnbrade Coil/Overunity?
« Reply #168 on: July 02, 2007, 21:47:49 »

Hi Bruce

Tank for help me.

good jobs in replicate

If you need help. send PM

Tanks


Re: The Brnbrade Coil/Overunity?
« Reply #265 on: July 03, 2007, 23:48:01 »

Words of McFarland

The mode of producing or starting the action in the helices consists in the use of a steel or electromagnet, or a helix, around one of the helices, and causing a secondary current in the inclosed helix by means of a battery current in the outer one; the action then in either the simple or compound helices increases in quantity to the maximum capacity of the wires to conduct with the existing tension of the current. If, now, the circuit is broken the current instantly ceases, and can only be restored by the same means that it was first produced; hence to allow the use of the main circuit for common purposes I introduce a rheostat or a resistance of any kind into the circuit, so that a small portion of the current only will flow along the resistance, by which means the action in the helices is feebly maintained when the main circuit is broken, and instantly restored when it is closed to its full force. By this means the action becomes in effect the same as the common battery currents, and may be used for similar purposes. For the purpose of preventing the heating of the helices caused by the intensity of the action, and to prevent circulation of the initial secondary currents in the main circuit, a rheostat of any convenient form may be made to constitute a part of the main circuit D. The alternate changes of the iron cores or magnets may be used for producing electro-magnetic motion, or motion to a wheel of any suitable device.

My words
Did anybody get AC current?


Re: The Brnbrade Coil/Overunity?
« Reply #305 on: Today at 15:22:46 »

Hi all

My secund test.
My secund device is named MagicCoils v2.0 Grin ... I accept suggestions Wink

I will begin in this project the most didactic. Step by Step.
I only want the friends' patience, I have social life and time for many other things.

Not only besides experiments.
Don't replicate before my tests...

Voylá


Re: The Brnbrade Coil/Overunity?
« Reply #306 on: Today at 16:40:48 »

Hi all.

We will begin for the that is right.

Electricity generates magnetism... Magnetism generates electricity...
Both two are one... and one doesn't live without the other...

I try simpler to prove that is an electromagnet coil.
The small flux of the electrons create magnetic field and magnetic field oscillating create flux of electrons...

What magnetic field oscillating create, flux of the electrons and flux of the electrons create magnetic fields?

Did we need to know more than that for the moment?
No. The one that we want is generator of power and that now is that we needed to know.

My device is based on this, in the foundation of the magnetism and of the Electricity.
Oscillate magnetic fields. Simple...

regards


Re: The Brnbrade Coil/Overunity?
« Reply #346 on: Today at 00:53:04 »

All.

I want for have calm.
I looking find relations between devices of tesla and McFarland among others that had gotten success.
Now I see clearly everything.
All are the same thing. It incases accurately in my experiences.
I can patience for the time lack and not efficient communication of my part with the colleagues.
I am walking slowly here, thus all will be able to see clearly as everything functions.
It is simple and it can frustrate some more is thus that it happens, and thus that has that to be.
It can frustrate all and it can happen as tesla, forgotten to the time.

regards


Re: The Brnbrade Coil/Overunity?
« Reply #351 on: Today at 03:26:00 »

Hi Bob.

My baterry 12v 7A unloaded your charges.
I am uses a 3v baterry.
They are connected to the ceramic capacitor


Re: The Brnbrade Coil/Overunity?
« Reply #366 on: July 06, 2007, 23:13:12 »

Hello all
tesla practiced these same methods

Tanks


Re: The Brnbrade Coil/Overunity?
« Reply #369 on: July 06, 2007, 23:53:09 »

Re: The Brnbrade Coil/Overunity?
« Reply #368 on: July 06, 2007, 23:34:13 »

@Brnbrade

Funny you should show that Tesla patent.

I have been thinking about that one since Erfinder came here and I had started to make a baling wire ring as shown. Never got around to it but will do it eventually.

Hi wattsup.

Tesla practiced these coils in a lot of patents.
I am investigating other well also happened.
It is hour of the game, put this patent in action. get one of the four coils to return in closed looped of a generator or battery and enjoy. Grin

Tanks


Re: The Brnbrade Coil/Overunity?
« Reply #447 on: Today at 14:26:01 »

QUOTE
(The english was translated on an online translator)

Hi wattsup
What I am making here is mini Vortex inside of the cook coils. It can seem joke for some, but it is accurately what all are looking for here.
The way that vocês is making is: to change magnetic field in transforming mobius.
The aluminum in my device has an important function. It is not only insulator of the dipositivo.
Science of the Vortex says, strong static element, annuls magnetic field and creates Vortex to driver.
Regards