Free Energy

Guys - Glen has again managed to get Scribd to delete my posting of our paper.  Over 6000 reads and at least 40 endorsements and a good forum for spreading the word.  This is the second time he's done this.  He will need to prove sole authorship - which will not be possible.  In any event I'm in touch with them there.

The copyright is not his.  He is not capable of writing a paper.  God knows.  He doesn't even know how to do the power analysis.  He contributed NOT ONE WORD to any of it.  Just his experiments.  For that matter nor did Ashtweth.  He would not be capable of writing a paper.  He does not have the verbal skills.  What a joke.  Then Harvey will come into the story and CLAIM that he was sole author.  And so it goes.  I do hope that you ALL see what is going on here.  They are DESPERATE.  And just so anxious to close the doors - any doors - to me.   

The good news is that I think what this is showing you all is that the NEWS is now truly breaking out of its stranglehold.  AT LAST.  It needed this commotion as wattsup pointed out.  Meanwhile - I need to leave this to you guys to do with it what you can or must.  I'm just too frantically busy.  Maybe later on in the week.

Kindest as ever,
Rosie

WOW! "Later in the week" flew by like it was only a couple of hours!
Really Rosemary, its better to not say anything about posting. It makes it look like you are WAFFLING.

J.

Guys - here is my link to Scribd.

http://www.scribd.com/aetherevarising

There is absolutely NOTHING in that that indicates that 'THIS WAS REMOVED BY THE REQUEST OF THE IEEE'. Not only that but I have been in contact with the admin at the IEEE and they know absolutely nothing about this.  But they're looking into it.

Glen.  There appears to be absolutely no limit to your malice.  Guys - until I've got to the bottom of this kindly IGNORE what Glen has written here and just check the link for yourselves.  Clearly Glen is yet again - trying to stir up a hornets nest.  The facts are that Glen is trying to divorce me from my access to my own work.  In terms of a collaboration any of the authors may publish the work anywhere they wish.  In the event that they're paid for it they are required to share that income.  Scribd have not paid me anything.  LOL.  And IF Glen has sole copyright on this work which he simply did not author - anywhere - then he must PROVE that copyright by showing us where he's registered this?  And IF he's registered then at least two of us authors will need to contest that registration.  It could only have been managed fraudulently.

Regards,
Rosemary

Guys - here is my link to Scribd.

There is absolutely NOTHING in that that indicates that 'THIS WAS REMOVED BY THE REQUEST OF THE IEEE'.

***********************************************************************************

"IN ROSEMARY'S OWN WORDS"

Here's the paper.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/26240411/PROVING-OVER-UNITY-THE-HARD-WORK-OF-MANY-DEDICATED-OPEN-SOURCE-MEMBERS

Rosemary

The data's freely available - all over the place Paul.  Here's the link that I gave to Loner.

Regards,
Rosemary

http://www.scribd.com/doc/26240411/PROVING-OVER-UNITY-THE-HARD-WORK-OF-MANY-DEDICATED-OPEN-SOURCE-MEMBERS

BTW here is that LINK
http://www.scribd.com/doc/26240411/PROVING-OVER-UNITY-THE-HARD-WORK-OF-MANY-DEDICATED-OPEN-SOURCE-MEMBERS

*** LEFT MOUSE BUTTON CLICK ***

http://www.scribd.com/doc/26240411/PROVING-OVER-UNITY-THE-HARD-WORK-OF-MANY-DEDICATED-OPEN-SOURCE-MEMBERS


.

In the first instance that is not my Scribd file. 

Rosemary

Rosemary Ainslie's "SWORN" legal affidavit to Scribd on http://www.scribd.com/doc/26240411/PROVING-OVER-UNITY-THE-HARD-WORK-OF-MANY-DEDICATED-OPEN-SOURCE-MEMBERS -  PDF file

http://public.blu.livefilestore.com/y1pwJGOmgUob3bhb4rFH8h80a2_WqI_dPm1XtU5xR2Ukb1zMllqjn92RfCWHKoqBc7L1aRTNWF_PbXw-Z0mb_4bMw/Ainslie_Affidavit_Scribd.pdf?download&psid=1

.

In the first instance that is not my Scribd file. 

Rosemary

Rosemary Ainslie's "SWORN" legal affidavit on Scribd  doc/26240411 http://www.scribd.com/doc/26240411/PROVING-OVER-UNITY-THE-HARD-WORK-OF-MANY-DEDICATED-OPEN-SOURCE-MEMBERS    -    PDF file        Name #2  -  Scribd  doc/26240411 

http://public.blu.livefilestore.com/y1pwJGOmgUob3bhb4rFH8h80a2_WqI_dPm1XtU5xR2Ukb1zMllqjn92RfCWHKoqBc7L1aRTNWF_PbXw-Z0mb_4bMw/Ainslie_Affidavit_Scribd.pdf?download&psid=1

*******************************************************************************************************************

http://www.energeticforum.com/83533-post27.html   (link)

witsend                     
Senior Member
        
More On The Hot Potato

I'm hoping this is the link to my Scribd publication. Note that all authors names have had to be removed as well as reference to all authors. TIE submission requires absolute anonymity. It's a fair criterion in my book. But it has not made it to review. I'll post the editors comments after this.

I hope the link works. I'll check it.
100130-071433-(GLEN)_01 Final Draft   

Ok. It's up and running. Was rather proud of all our efforts but it seems we still can't get it past the editors. This, like Iravani's application befort this, was dropped like a hot potato. Totally discouraged. On so many levels.

100130-071433-(GLEN)_01 Final Draft
http://www.scribd.com/doc/26240411/100130-071433-GLEN-01-Final-Draft       Name #1  -  Scribd  doc/26240411


Scribd  doc/26240411 identification number is in both Scribd  http://  links because it's the same document, just renamed once ...... so .....   


.
 

guys.  I'm intrigued.  Glen keeps posting copies of my earlier posts.  They're really most of them quite clear but hardly controversial.  I would have thought if he needed to malign me - then he'd post something controversial. 

What is happening now is that Glen is CLAIMING that the IEEE requested Scribd to remove that publication of the paper.  I have been in touch with them and certainly their Admin staff know nothing about this but will look into it during the course of the day.  If indeed it is true then we all need to know, myself included.  If it is not true then what Glen is doing now is defamation by proxy.  And what he is doing, however is trying to show the evidence by linking to his own Scribd publication where there would certainly NOT be any reference to a removal.  The TIE paper was never there to be removed.  What then is that removal referring to?

I'm willing to bet that there will be a Glen or Harvey letter of complaint to the IEEE - behind all of this and when I have that information to hand will put it forward here.  Harvey has often advised you that my object was to IMPLY that the IEEE had either reviewed or endorsed that publication.   The above quoted post by Glen is all the proof required that this was never the objective.  And there is ample mention in the title to that paper that it was NOT published.  I simply published it on Scribd as a faithful record of our TIE submission. 

Fortunately I also now have Glen's opinion on the matter that he has sole copyright.  What a load of nonsense.  Copyright in a collaboration is vested in ALL AUTHORS.  And each and any of us can publish anywhere in the world that we want - without any permission of the other collaborators.  It was very much my own work and I certainly have the right to publish.

Regards,
Rosemary

edited

Fuzzy:

Have you nothing better to do in your life than to make these sad attempts to malign this woman?  No wait, don't answer this, because you already have.

Very sad indeed.

Bill

Hi Glen/ALL

None of these guys get it and never will, they were not there. we have done every thing needed in My opinion to spell it out. We were honest that's all we need to do.I think we are better off not being distracted by all of this any more and getting back to work.

Ash