Free Energy

*
User Menu
movieclipsfree
movie clips free
Emergencyunit
Emergencyhelper
Statistics

  • *Total Posts: 255792
  • *Total Topics: 9053
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 18
  • *Guests: 129
  • *Spiders: 0
  • *Total: 147

cropcircles
*
Theme Selector
*
Renewable E.
Ecofun
SunPower
10 % Off
Great Hosting
*
Google Search

Author Topic: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder  (Read 41926 times)

fuzzytomcat

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 350
  • Open Source Experimentalist
    • View Profile
    • Personal Message (Offline)
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #780 on: November 05, 2010, 11:59:09 AM »
Howdy reading members and guests,

I would assume that most would know when you put your information on the web without any restrictions, without copyrights, all rights reserved or trademark notices like myself does, the public can use it with no strings attached except for gross misrepresentations, it's in the public domain and any patents are out of the question.    The "Mosfet Heating Circuit" is not patentable !!

I have made comments at Energetic Forum on Patents ..... and how there stolen from the inventor .....

http://www.energeticforum.com/90969-post21.html

Quote from: FuzzyTomCat;90969
Hi everyone,

There is one "exclusive" draw back to having the big alternative energy device when doing a patent .... and at the present time there is some 5,000 odd that has been taken by this amendment added in the late 1950's :suprise:

United States Patent Law: Title 35, Part II, Chapter 17, Sections 181-188  (link)   (page 44 of 88)

Quote
35 U.S.C. 181 Secrecy of certain inventions and withholding of patent.

Whenever publication or disclosure by the publication of an application or by the grant of a patent on an invention in which the Government has a property interest might, in the opinion of the head of the interested Government agency, be detrimental to the national security, the Commissioner of Patents upon being so notified shall order that the invention be kept secret and shall withhold the publication of an application or the grant of a patent therefor under the conditions set forth hereinafter.
Whenever the publication or disclosure of an invention by the publication of an application or by the granting of a patent, in which the Government does not have a property interest, might, in the opinion of the Commissioner of Patents, be detrimental to the national security, he shall make the application for patent in which such invention is disclosed available for inspection to the Atomic Energy Commission, the Secretary of Defense, and the chief officer of any other department or agency of the Government designated by the President as a defense agency of the United States.
Each individual to whom the application is disclosed shall sign a dated acknowledgment thereof, which acknowledgment shall be entered in the file of the application. If, in the opinion of the Atomic Energy Commission, the Secretary of a Defense Department, or the chief officer of another department or agency so designated, the publication or disclosure of the invention by the publication of an application or by the granting of a patent therefor would be detrimental to the national security, the Atomic Energy Commission, the Secretary of a Defense Department, or such other chief officer shall notify the Commissioner of Patents and the Commissioner of Patents shall order that the invention be kept secret and shall withhold the publication of the application or the grant of a patent for such period as the national interest requires, and notify the applicant thereof. Upon proper showing by the head of the department or agency who caused the secrecy order to be issued that the examination of the application might jeopardize the national interest, the Commissioner of Patents shall thereupon maintain the application in a sealed condition and notify the applicant thereof. The owner of an application which has been placed under a secrecy order shall have a right to appeal from the order to the Secretary of Commerce under rules prescribed by him.
An invention shall not be ordered kept secret and the publication of an application or the grant of a patent withheld for a period of more than one year. The Commissioner of Patents shall renew the order at the end thereof, or at the end of any renewal period, for additional periods of one year upon notification by the head of the department or the chief officer of the agency who caused the order to be issued that an affirmative determination has been made that the national interest continues to so require. An order in effect, or issued, during a time when the United States is at war, shall remain in effect for the duration of hostilities and one year following cessation of hostilities. An order in effect, or issued, during a national emergency declared by the President shall remain in effect for the duration of the national emergency and six months thereafter. The Commissioner of Patents may rescind any order upon notification by the heads of the departments and the chief officers of the agencies who caused the order to be issued that the publication or disclosure of the invention is no longer deemed detrimental to the national security.
(Amended Nov. 29, 1999, Public Law 106-113, sec. 1000(a)(9), 113 Stat. 1501A-566, 582 (S. 1948 secs. 4507(7) and 4732(a)(10)(B)).)


Sections 182 through 188 are really interesting !!

Good Luck !!

Best Regards,
Glen
:)

What has been avoided by Rosemary Ainslie is in any response in her "Intellectual Property Rights" as a INVENTOR of PATENT APPLICATIONS that are in her name.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellectual_property
Intellectual property (IP) is a term referring to a number of distinct types of creations of the mind for which property rights are recognized—and the corresponding fields of law.[1] Under intellectual property law, owners are granted certain exclusive rights  to a variety of intangible assets, such as musical, literary, and artistic works; discoveries and inventions; and words, phrases, symbols, and designs. Common types of intellectual property include copyrights, trademarks, patents, industrial design rights and trade secrets in some jurisdictions.


My question is how can a INVENTOR without the knowledge of electronic circuitry or electronic component operation or capability of construction of a electronic circuit INVENT a electronic circuit for a PATENT ?? and how can someone claim INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS as Rosemary Ainslie does on that electronic circuit ??

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=9645.msg254309#msg254309
http://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=23243.msg255644#msg255644
http://www.energeticforum.com/59001-post169.html
http://www.energeticforum.com/61040-post798.html
http://www.energeticforum.com/61453-post920.html


Regards,
Glen
.

Free Energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #780 on: November 05, 2010, 11:59:09 AM »
  • Reply with quoteQuote
Sponsored links:

b4FreeEnergy

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
    • Email
    • Personal Message (Offline)
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #781 on: November 05, 2010, 01:15:15 PM »
Hi Glen,

Apart from the never ending cat-fight between you and Rosemary, did you meanwhile make any progress with this circuit? I would be great to hear some positive news once in a while … We’re still burning oil, BP can pollute huge areas in the Gulf of Mexico, nobody seems to care much and everything just continues like before. Not the slightest sign there will be a change shortly! I have the feeling that if I don’t look at this forum and come back after 5 years, you and Rosemary are still bickering, nothing much changed and we’re still burning oil … ;-)

Cheers,
B

Free Energy

truthbeknown

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 92
    • View Profile
    • Personal Message (Online)
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #782 on: November 05, 2010, 07:26:03 PM »
Hi Glen,

Apart from the never ending cat-fight between you and Rosemary, did you meanwhile make any progress with this circuit? I would be great to hear some positive news once in a while … We’re still burning oil, BP can pollute huge areas in the Gulf of Mexico, nobody seems to care much and everything just continues like before. Not the slightest sign there will be a change shortly! I have the feeling that if I don’t look at this forum and come back after 5 years, you and Rosemary are still bickering, nothing much changed and we’re still burning oil … ;-)

Cheers,
B


So Umm B, Can you tell us whatever happened with YOUR test data and apparatus you built? How did Rosemary HELP you in getting things accomplished? We know she could not help GADH with answers to his questions. How did things go for you?

 :)
J.

doozy2

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5
    • View Profile
    • Personal Message (Offline)
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #783 on: November 05, 2010, 08:33:24 PM »
I happen to know that Rosemary is not able to read or answer any posts here.  Not at the moment.  But she will.  And Glen - I will make it my personal mission to see you in hell if she does not get around to deleting your crap.

And I am not threatening you.  That is my promise.  You are an inarticulate imbecile.  b4FreeEnergy - you are way too polite.  The guy is a dirty con plagiarist who is trying to kill this work so that he can steal it.  Just tell it like it is.  How anyone can give him the space for all that crap is beyond me.  Who even reads it?  What a half wit.

Free Energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #783 on: November 05, 2010, 08:33:24 PM »
  • Reply with quoteQuote

fuzzytomcat

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 350
  • Open Source Experimentalist
    • View Profile
    • Personal Message (Offline)
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #784 on: November 05, 2010, 08:34:24 PM »
Hi Glen,

Apart from the never ending cat-fight between you and Rosemary, did you meanwhile make any progress with this circuit? I would be great to hear some positive news once in a while … We’re still burning oil, BP can pollute huge areas in the Gulf of Mexico, nobody seems to care much and everything just continues like before. Not the slightest sign there will be a change shortly! I have the feeling that if I don’t look at this forum and come back after 5 years, you and Rosemary are still bickering, nothing much changed and we’re still burning oil … ;-)

Cheers,
B

Hey B,

I was wondering where you went .... good to hear from you !

Well after I posted this over at Energetic forum .....

http://www.energeticforum.com/93746-post74.html    POST #74      ( May 02, 2010 )
Quote from: FuzzyTomCat;93746

Quote
Originally Posted by Harvey  View Post
Thanks Glen,

As always I am impressed by your work

I was trying to do some basic calculations on how long your two batteries can sustain a 5.5 watt load. I come up with about 104 hours, does that sound right? They are each 12Ah batteries so there is 24Ah of charge in them. A basic DC breakdown is 5.5W / 24V = 0.229A. 24Ah / 0.229A = 104 hours.

So all we need to do now is run for more than 104 hours on those batteries and we have pretty good proof that we have extra energy coming from somewhere else And that's not even counting the lost energy in MOSFET or CSR to heat. Good Stuff!

ETA: Oh, I almost forgot - if we conclude that those Gel-Cell (edit: wait, those or Liquid Acid?) batteries are discharged when they reach 10V each, then that would be a drop of 4V over the 104 hours. That would give us a 0.0385V (38.5mV) drop per hour. So for the 5 hours we would have expected a minimum of 193mV drop not counting the energy spent on the MOSFET and CSR. Our results show only 110mV drop in that time frame, 83mV short of the linear projection. So you can see why we think we are getting energy from somewhere. Either that, or our battery discharge is not linear And BTW, it only gets better for us if we conclude the battery voltage should be lower than 10V when discharged (of course we all know that the battery voltage needs to be measured under specific load conditions)

Hey Harvey,

I'm sorry it took so long to do a detailed overview of the "LIVE" broadcast I did in the "Open Source Research and Development" channel on the January 9, 2010 5 Hour non stop video recording.

This video as you are aware is one of the best ever recorded representation of the preferred mode of operation but only in a non stop 5 Hour video. I'm sure that many members and guests don't realize the difficulty in capturing this effect for the purpose of recording the data properly and if given the time looking at the recorded video everyone can see the problems that we face in getting accurate data.

The constant 24 volt battery bank voltage fluctuations going up and down the Mosfet "drain" spike oscillating from 500 to 900 volts, battery voltage down the Mosfet spikes, battery voltage up the Mosfet voltage to normal operating range, back and forth over and over.

I have tried to get as close to this mode of operation in   Test #13    which was used in the IEEE submittal Open Source Evaluation of Power Transients Generated to Improve Performance Coefficient of Resistive Heating Systems the team including yourself did, and in   Test #22 but never being able to record the data scientifically correct because of the circuits complex oscillating waveforms. I don't think everyone, members and guests understands that the Test #13 was done with a Tektronix TDS 3054C which has a maximum resolution of 10K of data spread over a 10 x 10 grid or divisions so each one has 1k of data samples separately for each of the 4 channels. The data collected in Test #22 was with a Tektronix DPO 3054 which has a maximum resolution of 5M of data, but I used the 100K which is spread over the same 10 x 10 grid or divisions so each one has 10k of data samples separately for each of the 4 channels ..... ten ( 10 ) times the data of the TDS 3054C used in Test #13.

The problem being we need to find a method of capturing the data continuously in real time, there's nothing wrong with Tektronix TDS 3054C or the DPO 3054 these are the finest instruments I've ever used and are extremely accurate, but if you push the acquire button at the wrong time you can appear to get conflicting or skewed data, not the case .... were you before the spike, during the spike or after the spike when the data was collected. I had a allotted dedicated set time to record the data, It was the time frame I used with the 6 minutes or as fast as the data could be physically collected with the finest equipment I had at my disposal.

I am in total agreement with you that something "good" is happening in the Mosfet Heating Circuit and can be plainly seen in the recorded videos, we just need to somehow get a streaming real time data recording. Maybe by somehow obtaining a   Real-Time Spectrum Analyzers from Tektronix or some other method to verify the data findings as you suggested, the equipment I previously used as good as it is, just isn't enough to totally capture what is occurring during the preferred mode of operation.

Best Regards,
Glen
:)

There was this paragraph in the posting on my evaluation after reviewing the data for two months ......

I am in total agreement with you that something "good" is happening in the Mosfet Heating Circuit and can be plainly seen in the recorded videos, we just need to somehow get a streaming real time data recording. Maybe by somehow obtaining a   Real-Time Spectrum Analyzers from Tektronix or some other method to verify the data findings as you suggested, the equipment I previously used as good as it is, just isn't enough to totally capture what is occurring during the preferred mode of operation.

This is when I stopped the research because of the lack of a better test instrument to get accurate readings that could be used without question of the results, and the beginning of the heated attacks and allegations from Rosemary including her expression of "intellectual property" rights on my and Harvey's work.

But to be continued .....

Best Regards,
Glen
 :)

fuzzytomcat

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 350
  • Open Source Experimentalist
    • View Profile
    • Personal Message (Offline)
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #785 on: November 05, 2010, 08:49:25 PM »
I happen to know that Rosemary is not able to read or answer any posts here.  Not at the moment.  But she will.  And Glen - I will make it my personal mission to see you in hell if she does not get around to deleting your crap.

And I am not threatening you.  That is my promise.  You are an inarticulate imbecile.  b4FreeEnergy - you are way too polite.  The guy is a dirty con plagiarist who is trying to kill this work so that he can steal it.  Just tell it like it is.  How anyone can give him the space for all that crap is beyond me.  Who even reads it?  What a half wit.

What do we have here ??? a reincarnated Rosemary Ainslie "TROLL" ..... good thing IP addresses are traceable ..... ever heard of "TERMS of SERVICE" ??

Free Energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #785 on: November 05, 2010, 08:49:25 PM »
  • Reply with quoteQuote
Sponsored links:

doozy2

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5
    • View Profile
    • Personal Message (Offline)
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #786 on: November 05, 2010, 09:29:51 PM »
What do we have here ??? a reincarnated Rosemary Ainslie "TROLL" ..... good thing IP addresses are traceable ..... ever heard of "TERMS of SERVICE" ??

What a joke.  If I am a troll - you imbecile - then what does that make you? 

Are you surprised that Tektronix refused to lend you any more equipment?  I saw it coming sure as sun up.  What you need is a long session with a straight jacket.

Free Energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #786 on: November 05, 2010, 09:29:51 PM »
  • Reply with quoteQuote

fuzzytomcat

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 350
  • Open Source Experimentalist
    • View Profile
    • Personal Message (Offline)
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #787 on: November 05, 2010, 09:37:44 PM »
********************************************************************************************

What a joke.  If I am a troll - you imbecile - then what does that make you? 

Are you surprised that Tektronix refused to lend you any more equipment?  I saw it coming sure as sun up.  What you need is a long session with a straight jacket.

Glad you brought that up  .....   TEKTRONIX - "PDF" ( Request_for_return_due_to_misleading_intent.pdf  ) 

http://hunpug.blu.livefilestore.com/y1pDiDK1ktVu-qC9r8Ka-C7HoXyp6kDwias1MRFFA_ZkmbXleEEDOERy3-J67OzLqyewMhHmZaRnd1QqUks0kEA4Mafrnd5Tdqe/Request_for_return_due_to_misleading_intent.pdf?download&psid=1


********************************************************************************************
« Last Edit: November 06, 2010, 07:44:12 AM by fuzzytomcat »

Free Energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #787 on: November 05, 2010, 09:37:44 PM »
  • Reply with quoteQuote

fuzzytomcat

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 350
  • Open Source Experimentalist
    • View Profile
    • Personal Message (Offline)
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #788 on: November 06, 2010, 05:47:29 AM »
Howdy reading members and guests,

Here are some very telling postings from Rosemary that are"IN HER OWN WORDS" ......

*************************************************************************************************

http://www.energeticforum.com/59541-post322.html      07-07-2009   Post #322

Quote
witsend 
Senior Member
        
Guys, I think the need to at least display our waveform is taken on board. I have no idea how to do this and will have to impose on my co-author's time which is already massively constrained. So don't hold your breath but I will try and get this.

I will also, subject to my son's return - try and get some video information our on our own circuit. It is the same as the box that was sent to ABB for their replication purposes. Some years after their tests, they contacted me and asked what they were to do with that box. I was in correspondence with someone - can't remember who - and asked them to ship it to him. But it is feasible to replicate the circuitry. I'm just not sure who will do this. I certainly can't. But I could, at least, ask around. It's just that the guys who worked on the circuit are now drowning in other work and one of them has left for Durban - so is not easily reached.

But, as I see it, all that is needed is some accurate assessment of the energy returned to the battery. Is it that difficult to get hold of the correct measuring instruments? Perhaps Aaron you could advise me here. I can't see any other way of working out the energy in that 'spike' without the meter that can tell the difference between the two current cycles.


I think the need to at least display our waveform is taken on board

I will also, subject to my son's return - try and get some video information our on our own circuit. It is the same as the box that was sent to ABB for their replication purposes. Some years after their tests, they contacted me and asked what they were to do with that box.

************************************************************************************************


http://www.energeticforum.com/60279-post511.html     07-13-2009   Post #511

Quote
witsend 
Senior Member

Joit - is your waveform proving TinselKoala's point? Is that 555 switch wrongly presented? To me it looks like it is. In which case, I must apologise to all concerned. Clearly the Quantum article was wrong.

So, to all concerned - to everyone who built the circuit as presented in that article, and if, indeed, it is wrong, my abject apologies. I had a shrewd idea it may have been wrong because, thinking back, a university professor kindly edited the quantum paper prior to presenting it to the IET. And his first recommendation was that we omitted a detailed circuit of the 555 switch as being irrelevant to the claim. Which is why I was reluctant to endorse the Quantum article as being a correct presentation.I just wish, in retrospect, that he had pointed out the error if he had seen such. In any event, it seems that I have been entirely at fault. My own objection to it was due to the lack of the feedback diode - which was the entire subject of the exercise. I knew it was in the apparatus. It certainly was not in diagram.

I would point out though, that my reluctance to admit this prior to ascertaining the fact was due to the person who presented that diagram and assisted me in that first article. He is a good friend and he, like all of us, was 'giving' his time. I was not keen therefore to expose the problem unless I also knew it was a problem. So, if you're reading this, don't even worry. In any event, the blame was not his. I should, at least, have had the circuit vetted - considering my own inability to read such.

So. Many apologies, even to TinselKoala and anyone in the entire world who duplicated that circuit. It is wrongly presented. I am sincerely sorry that I have wasted so much of your time. And Joit - you've put the question to bed. I would be very glad to refund you for your time and trouble - if required - and if I can get the money to you with our exchange control. Just send me an account on the PM system. You've done a very good thing here.

What I do assure you all is this. The switch may have been wrongly drawn. Our own duty cycle application is NOT. I have the experimental apparatus available and it has been checked by EE's even at universities. We have also, over the years, built many different 555 switches and by different people. And there are replicated experiments by others using nothing but a functions generator. And all this prior to publication. More to the point is that the battery duration is consistent with measurements based on the duty cycle. But, in point of fact, after publication I never experimented again for a period of 7 years and I certainly never even looked at the article again. The only reason I could scan a copy for the blog when I eventually did this, was because my children kept a copy of the original publication. I was just so dejected at the entire lack of interest it seemed to generate. I had no idea that the test would really ever be duplicated.

Therefore, please take this admission as a sincere apology to all those who have tried to build the switch according to the quantum article. I see that the Quantum article was the primary reference point as the IET paper was only posted to the blog after July. It seems that Ramset and TinselKoala started their thread on OU.COM in mid June. Unfortunate. But there you are. Sorry guys - It's all I can say.


Clearly the Quantum article was wrong.

I had a shrewd idea it may have been wrong because, thinking back, a university professor kindly edited the quantum paper prior to presenting it to the IET.

I have the experimental apparatus available

and it has been checked by EE's even at universities.

scan a copy  ( link ) http://www.free-energy.ws/pdf/quantum_october_2002.pdf

my children kept a copy of the original publication.

*************************************************************************************************

I would say some incredibly interesting *highlighted* "IN YOUR OWN WORDS" from Rosemary .....


Regards,
Glen

.

Free Energy

happyfunball

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 237
    • View Profile
    • Personal Message (Offline)
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #789 on: November 06, 2010, 06:32:31 AM »
It's her circuit, Fuzzy. Cut the crap already.

Free Energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #789 on: November 06, 2010, 06:32:31 AM »
  • Reply with quoteQuote
Sponsored links:

fuzzytomcat

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 350
  • Open Source Experimentalist
    • View Profile
    • Personal Message (Offline)
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #790 on: November 06, 2010, 06:51:02 AM »
It's her circuit, Fuzzy. Cut the crap already.

Sorry .... The question at hand is how can a INVENTOR without the knowledge of electronic circuitry or electronic component operation or the capability of construction of a electronic circuit INVENT a electronic circuit for a PATENT or PATENT APPLICATION?? and how can someone claim INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS as Rosemary Ainslie does on that electronic circuit ??

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=9645.msg254309#msg254309
http://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=23243.msg255644#msg255644
http://www.energeticforum.com/59001-post169.html
http://www.energeticforum.com/59005-post170.html
http://www.energeticforum.com/59033-post182.html
http://www.energeticforum.com/59369-post262.html
http://www.energeticforum.com/61040-post798.html
http://www.energeticforum.com/61453-post920.html


That's the question at hand .......

Regards,
Glen

.

Free Energy

fuzzytomcat

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 350
  • Open Source Experimentalist
    • View Profile
    • Personal Message (Offline)
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / Energetic Forum E-mail
« Reply #791 on: November 06, 2010, 09:01:39 PM »
Howdy reading members and guests,

Here is a copy of a e-mail from Energetic Forum from May 06, 2010 this will be inserted into my "time line" for my testing and evaluation of the experimental device http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=9442.msg262932#msg262932

***********************************************************************************


----- Original Message -----
From: <info@esmhome.org>
To: <ainslie@xxxxxxx.za>; <hwgramm@xxxxx.com>; <fuzzytomcat@xxxxxxx.net>
Cc: <ashtweth@xxxxx.com>; <tot1@xxx.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 11:11 AM
Subject: Forum


Greetings,

Unfortunately, there are still numerous posts occurring on the forum 
that contain unnecessary disagreements between certain members.

It is obvious that there are conflicts that are not going to be 
resolved any time in the near future.

The forum is a place to share and learn.  Questioning is fine if it is 
done with respect, but we have seen that this is not what is happening 
here.

It is possible to share your work without speaking of each other?s.

We ask from now forward that you do not reference or question the work 
of each other (Rosemary, Harvey, FuzzyTomCat) in any posts on 
Energetic Forum or via Energetic Forums Private Messaging.

To be quite clear, you are welcome to share your work, your ideas, 
your results.
Just do NOT reference each others work, ideas, results.

Each one of you is valued on the Forum, however, the Peace and good 
nature of the Forum have been interrupted and this cannot continue.

There are four admins to the forum, Aaron is one of them, however he 
has wisely recused himself on this matter.  The three others admins 
have made this decision.


To repeat, it is our place to make sure the good nature of the Forum 
is maintained.  We believe that is possible by simply posting about 
your own work and in no way referencing (directly or indirectly) 
anyone else with which you have a conflict.


If you do (reference anyone that you have a conflict with), you will 
be banned.


Admin


************************************************************************************

Rosemary Ainslie's Work -
Quantum - October 2002
http://www.free-energy.ws/pdf/quantum_october_2002.pdf
http://public.blu.livefilestore.com/y1pK6ZokTOiduva2cT0_G64RytAK78-jc1ncm-Caeeh6-jJtTBtlPQXbFEOnzYYNAIz4Toe0Bi-6U52zMPiRgLe2Q/Quantum%20Circuit%20Diagram.bmp?psid=1
http://public.blu.livefilestore.com/y1p7KK7dz82OLad03kAKZzrW4Cr5oLZ08P79cmRlnezQQcuSqUnahxfF1yWs0wfnCaHUPs4TdDB6M3IwjR7E_64GQ/Quantum%20Circuit%20Parts.bmp?psid=1

Patent Applications
http://public.blu.livefilestore.com/y1pmDTYsvO5wFpJKvF34_-_L0RFEs91CobL5JI2CtmSG23h3_Dgqa_fWZDZnDI8HLEKs873g-29N0Kr0gBKfK7lPw/ZA9900385A.pdf?download&psid=1
http://public.blu.livefilestore.com/y1pY9zromnq3JHJ1o0T0g9QjRs7VPZcqThJ86nKtpoaSvUW6gP6jPLbaOqFGvp4ihuV1n9LyS8Bvnr8-i2QuEQmyQ/EP0932248A1.pdf?download&psid=1
http://public.blu.livefilestore.com/y1p3kQ7ZZSqJBdRdeq3O2tajGhBgpE_oR8D9cwHxinHkZN3YxQ29N20s6mDVwlxF5HcnITG-XkrKAuOfPjp9_gS5g/WO9938247A1.pdf?download&psid=1
http://public.blu.livefilestore.com/y1pZikJBtJ8iE-5lGkZODp8Ye42KnDF3jQkw_QGxc6y6acTDhhhWpNLVY_PVnjLgiZ4prto3e2F1zSgiFIaXYzpOg/WO03007657A2.pdf?download&psid=1

EIT - Paper
http://public.blu.livefilestore.com/y1p8T0piJ2-wv-sflr-t4UY-2855DJelDiICeYF6L1ypzMg2A4_JVpE4jldrrNqBRdzbWkD6Wb3svbHO91HC8azsg/EIT_paper.pdf?download&psid=1


Glen and Harvey's Work -
http://www.energeticforum.com/inductive-resistor/5359-mosfet-heating-circuits.html
http://hunpug.blu.livefilestore.com/y1ptY5lQX5cEKs1-SxZEwcwRDtDC0qJqANch3a5_ZMKBinBfkH-3AcoeojJRDdajmHCviQnh8h--tRRMyOvaq6Z-bsqyfM7xNnw/Mosfet_Heater_Circuit_11-26-2009.bmp?psid=1
http://hunpug.blu.livefilestore.com/y1pTtnP1kyqU26UsLdwXn0VE5ZftXiNL3dgXc4useQnNT8ir5Zu0oT8vqiqUHU9ptCh5L_Da3pDwQ0HqeNa4tX2dsxYeZMYQtZV/Mosfet%20Heater%20Circuit%20Components.bmp?psid=1

************************************************************************************


Regards,
Glen

.

Free Energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / Energetic Forum E-mail
« Reply #791 on: November 06, 2010, 09:01:39 PM »
  • Reply with quoteQuote

happyfunball

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 237
    • View Profile
    • Personal Message (Offline)
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #792 on: November 07, 2010, 12:31:49 AM »
Cut the garbage, it's Rosemary's circuit.

Harvey

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 143
    • View Profile
    • Email
    • Personal Message (Offline)
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #793 on: November 07, 2010, 07:27:15 AM »
It's her circuit, Fuzzy. Cut the crap already.

With all due respect happyfunball, you will find the same circuit outlined here in Fig 12a:
http://www.datasheetcatalog.org/datasheet/irf/irfpg50.pdf

That PDF has a date of 10/97.

However, The HEXFET Power MOSFET Designer's Manual HDM-3 of which I have in my library, has the exact same circuit and is dated September 1993. You will also find that document included in the references in my work used in the paper.

The record clearly shows the circuit to be in the public domain at least five years prior to Rosemary filing her first patent application.

No one is trying to steal anything, it is already available for everyone to use and has been for over 17 years now.

 ;)

Free Energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #793 on: November 07, 2010, 07:27:15 AM »
  • Reply with quoteQuote

happyfunball

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 237
    • View Profile
    • Personal Message (Offline)
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #794 on: November 07, 2010, 12:55:15 PM »
With all due respect happyfunball, you will find the same circuit outlined here in Fig 12a:
http://www.datasheetcatalog.org/datasheet/irf/irfpg50.pdf

That PDF has a date of 10/97.

However, The HEXFET Power MOSFET Designer's Manual HDM-3 of which I have in my library, has the exact same circuit and is dated September 1993. You will also find that document included in the references in my work used in the paper.

The record clearly shows the circuit to be in the public domain at least five years prior to Rosemary filing her first patent application.

No one is trying to steal anything, it is already available for everyone to use and has been for over 17 years now.

 ;)

I won't debate the merits of your claims, since they're irrelevant. Why? Because Rosemary is open sourcing the entire thing. Why not let her test the circuit and theories and perhaps even thank her.
 

Hi All,

please add on your site a link to OverUnity.com

and get back great targeted traffic..

Please click here to go to
Link-Submit-Page

Many thanks in advance.
Regards, Stefan. (admin)

Page created in 0.233 seconds with 29 queries.