Free Energy

*
User Menu
movieclipsfree
movie clips free
Emergencyunit
Emergencyhelper
Statistics

  • *Total Posts: 255792
  • *Total Topics: 9053
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 18
  • *Guests: 128
  • *Spiders: 0
  • *Total: 146

cropcircles
*
Theme Selector
*
Renewable E.
Ecofun
SunPower
10 % Off
Great Hosting
*
Google Search

Author Topic: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder  (Read 41926 times)

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1225
    • View Profile
    • Personal Message (Online)
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #810 on: November 08, 2010, 05:27:41 PM »
And in conclusion - let me assure you.  If I am BANNED then not one but TWO forums that are both apparently dedicated to Free Energy and the general advancement of critically required technology - will be sorely embarrassed when we make FULL PUBLIC DISCLOSURE of all those results.  What then Ashtweth?  Will you be running in the front of that all that inevitable interest trying to tell everyone that this is NOT our work but GLEN'S?  LOL.  Or will you be saying that 6 OF US HAVE FOUND HER TO BE A LIAR AND THAT THIS IS NOT HER WORK.  SHE'S INCAPABLE OF IT? 

I assure you that I have many, many, many more than 6 people who will attest to this work preceding this parody of a replication.  And in as much as they are accredited - then I think we will ALL be able to rest on those advices.  And if you THINK I'm a liar - then I really don't mind.  And I'm not sure anymore how committed Panacea is to free energy when you go to such lengths to try and get me banned.  I have ALWAYS been committed to the advancement of clean green.

It seems that you and Glen and Harvey say exactly what you like about me.  But I MAY NOT DEFEND MYSELF nor return the attack.  NOR is there protection on this forum any longer.  It seems that I must have no means of countering your ALLEGATIONS.

Rosemary

Free Energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #810 on: November 08, 2010, 05:27:41 PM »
  • Reply with quoteQuote
Sponsored links:

fuzzytomcat

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 350
  • Open Source Experimentalist
    • View Profile
    • Personal Message (Offline)
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #811 on: November 08, 2010, 08:03:00 PM »
Howdy reading members and guests,

Another quote from Rosemary "in her own words" ......


http://www.energeticforum.com/61506-post942.html   July 20,2009    Post #942

Quote
witsend 

hi Joit. Love the comments. What scares me is not the academics - because at least they sincerely believe in their science - with good reason. Its the detractors on other forums that are worrying. The lengths they go to to discredit the person and the claim - both.

Have you ever looked through the OU.Com thread on this? It beggars belief. Malice hardly describes it. And the amount of money that is spent on displaying tests and parading brand new state of the art equipment that is never effectively used. Weeks go by without a single test result - just promises of this. Yet we are constantly advised that the claim is wrong. Has it ever occurred to anyone that - to this day - no single power measurement has been made on the circuitry? No test has been run to duration of a battery capacity. Brand new state of the art equipment is constantly on display but never are its full functions referenced. Small irrelevant points become critical evidence of a lack of proof and are championed with an unabashed repetitiveness that is boringly persistent but brutally destructive. But no actual proof is offered.

What is frightening is that anyone who questions a result is actually verbally menaced. One post we've got on record is of Ramset's answer to a challenging observation by one of their contributors. He actually wrote to the effect that 'owlsley needs to kiwl the kitty'. TK is on record as openly saying that I am a mendacious prevaricator. Apparently all aspects of our test are some sort of public con, apparently aimed at I don't know what? Surely my stated intention not to capitalise on the device must bring my motives to question. Clearly, if I am perpetuating a con - then it's not for purposes of defrauding the public. Why would I go to such lengths to expose a small little effect, possibly the smallest of any OU claim ever offered up for consideration? What is it that deserves their heavy handed attempts at wit or sarcasm, done with the orchestrated approval of other 'so called' scientists sharing that thread. TK only needs to make a post for immediate endorsement by other contributors who also then mock my apparent lack of sanity, judgement, intelligence, schooling, beliefs, ideas, lack of expertise - name it's all there. All for public consumption. All unchallenged. And all such detractors always out of reach, always carefully hiding behind their assumed identities. They flirt with their rights to freedom of expression that under normal circumstances, and under ordinary civil law would be actionable. And all this, clearly with Stephan's endorsement. Never do they give us their names. Never do they disclose their identities. Never are we in a position to find out their actual motives.

To compound my concerns is the fact that the entire forum was promoted by Stephan, with, one would assume, the intention of promoting the study of free energy. I can no longer access OU.Com. Was he responsible for my not gaining access? And if so, at whose asking and why? Public - to everyone but me? Then too it seems that my emails are being read. How does that happen? Are my phone calls also being monitored?

It's all very puzzling. All I want is an answer to the question posed in my paper - ideally from academics who can validate the result or not and comment accordingly. If they won't hear me then maybe they'll listen to you guys? It's quite important really. But its only a small question. In the light of the attack, however, I'm realising how significant it is. Certainly it seems to be sufficiently significant for them to do everything in their power to destroy my reputation and my work - both. Why is it that important? I can only propose it's because we're near the truth and this, for some reason, needs to be discredited. And again. Why?



And all this, clearly with Stephan's endorsement. Never do they give us their names. Never do they disclose their identities. Never are we in a position to find out their actual motives.


To compound my concerns is the fact that the entire forum was promoted by Stephan, with, one would assume, the intention of promoting the study of free energy. I can no longer access OU.Com. Was he responsible for my not gaining access? And if so, at whose asking and why? Public - to everyone but me? Then too it seems that my emails are being read. How does that happen? Are my phone calls also being monitored?


**********************************************************************************************


I'll let Stefan handle the last past flaming posts starting at Post #803 from Rosemary about her recent banning and moderator status here at Over Unity Forum and her unfounded unproved allagations again against everyone in the world but her.  The truth hurts ......


Regards,
Glen


.
« Last Edit: November 08, 2010, 09:00:26 PM by fuzzytomcat »

Free Energy

b4FreeEnergy

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
    • Email
    • Personal Message (Offline)
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #812 on: November 08, 2010, 08:21:43 PM »
Hi Rosemary,

I don’t know every detail of what happened between you and the famous 6 or three or whatever but I guess what needed to be told is told often enough now in this thread and in the former thread(s) at Energetic Forum. It’s almost as if you killed somebody and are trying to get away with it! What did you do to have them so viciously following you? I don't get it. In any case I do admire your energy and courage to continue posting here on your new thread. I would have kissed goodbye all this long ago without ever looking back! 

Are there any new results from your setup at the SA University?

Cheers,
B

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1605
  • dum spiro pugno
    • View Profile
    • Personal Message (Offline)
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #813 on: November 08, 2010, 11:00:05 PM »
I have been hospitalised for nearly a week.
glad you are back. hope you are feeling better.

Free Energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #813 on: November 08, 2010, 11:00:05 PM »
  • Reply with quoteQuote

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1605
  • dum spiro pugno
    • View Profile
    • Personal Message (Offline)
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #814 on: November 08, 2010, 11:07:00 PM »
All that happened in this whole saga is people did not listen to creditable hard workers in the open source community  and made a fool out of themselves. we know who you are now. I am glad this is over, we told you so, all as it did was unnecessary distract engineers from work.
now we can get on with the job with out the you know whats.

Ash

didn't you have an intricate plan about not posting here anymore?
Quote from: ashtweth nihilisti
Just posting for others emailing me, here , that i wont be involved in this thread/forum/ incident, and for others to ignore any reference to me (never mind posting/emailing me about it) . Good luck with your experiments here.

what happened? no integrity?

poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1109
  • It's not as complicated as it may seem...
    • View Profile
    • Email
    • Personal Message (Offline)
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #815 on: November 08, 2010, 11:24:50 PM »
Glen,

Rose was able post earlier today. Are you saying she has now been put on "read only" status?

.99

Free Energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #815 on: November 08, 2010, 11:24:50 PM »
  • Reply with quoteQuote
Sponsored links:

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1605
  • dum spiro pugno
    • View Profile
    • Personal Message (Offline)
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #816 on: November 08, 2010, 11:37:53 PM »
Glen,

Rose was able post earlier today. Are you saying she has now been put on "read only" status?

.99
no, he is posting quotes that are over a year old.

http://www.energeticforum.com/61506-post942.html   July 20,2009    Post #942

the date is what gives it away poynty... ;)

Free Energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #816 on: November 08, 2010, 11:37:53 PM »
  • Reply with quoteQuote

poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1109
  • It's not as complicated as it may seem...
    • View Profile
    • Email
    • Personal Message (Offline)
no, he is posting quotes that are over a year old.

the date is what gives it away poynty... ;)

I was referring to this bit of Glen's post where he is talking about recent posts and events:
Quote
I'll let Stefan handle the last past flaming posts starting at Post #803 from Rosemary about her recent banning and moderator status here at Over Unity Forum and her unfounded unproved allagations again against everyone in the world but her.  The truth hurts ......


Regards,
Glen

Apparently as you can see, Rose has had her moderator status removed already.

.99

Free Energy

  • Reply with quoteQuote

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1225
    • View Profile
    • Personal Message (Online)
Poynty - it seems that my moderator status has been removed.  What that actually means is that I will not be able to develop my thread here.  Glen will continue to flame it and the subject will be drowned in irrelevancies.  It's not a public banning - but it's the next best thing.

What worries me is that Harti is changing the forum and has already advised me that he is to delete this work.  Not only does that entirely BREACH the general commitments to Open Source and public record - but I would CERTAINLY NOT have embarked on this if I thought for one moment - that he would do this.  Yet again I've been duped.  And he would not be co-operating with Glen et al if he actually had any interest in furthering this work.  It seems very strange to me that he sees the need to do this at all.  My readership is fairly large - and I think an understanding of the concepts are growing.  So.  Why then the requirement to change anything at all?

It's amusing to see Glen faithfully recording all those posts of mine.  History really does repeat itself.  My own take is that we have a really powerful technology and - for whatever reason - this must NEVER be either fully recorded or understood.  In effect it may be advisable to download some of the posts here.  They'll have a scarcity value very soon.  And in the light of this new development - I'm inclined to think that OU.com is not really that interested in progressing clean green.  Perhaps the idea of all these forums is simply to 'take' as much as possible in order to lead in the field of this dark energy.  If self interest is the required character attribute - then indeed, GLen, Harvey, Ashtweth et all - are over qualified.  It will be an enduring shame if they are the effective 'holders' or 'representatives' of this new technology.  God knows.  They don't even understand it. 

It seems that the only thread that will be allowed to keep it's moderator status is the Joule Thief.  I'm actually really glad of this because I think it's HIGHLY desirable technology.  My own take is that they're exploiting the same 'root source' of energy as is identified in the casimir effect.  I have more than a few ideas how to 'up the ante'.  But I'll discuss this privately with Pirate - as I am entirely satisfied that he is CERTAINLY committed to clean green and all that is lacking at the moment is the 'volume' so to speak.  I also think that lasersaber's drive to run that motor without any water - will be a significant development.  One hopes that they will not then be hounded as I have been.

Kindest regards,
Rosie.

Free Energy

ashtweth_nihilisti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 635
  • Open souce will free humanity
    • View Profile
    • WWW
    • Email
    • Personal Message (Online)
Stefan is not stupid, the EF.com banned Rose cause of her behavior after being asked to take any personal crusades off the forum (which were nothing to do with us BTW) was ignored. Stefan also wants none of this nonessential blabber in this forum.

Mean time, we have all been doing open source work, at the EF.com and other things, no one needs or cares for any distractions of this kind. Stefan is not stupid Rose. Neither are Glen, Harvey, Aaron, myself and others you have dealt with who all say the same thing.
Thats the last post of this kind i am doing. I feel for Glen/Harvey and Aaron, they could of been light years ahead with their open source  work if they had not had to deal with this mess, i have been watching. Those who want to work, i suggest you display this trait now. Rose wont be doing this mess for much longer. I Have a lot of work to do BTW.

Ash

Free Energy

  • Reply with quoteQuote
Sponsored links:

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1225
    • View Profile
    • Personal Message (Online)
Hi Rosemary,

I don’t know every detail of what happened between you and the famous 6 or three or whatever but I guess what needed to be told is told often enough now in this thread and in the former thread(s) at Energetic Forum. It’s almost as if you killed somebody and are trying to get away with it! What did you do to have them so viciously following you? I don't get it. In any case I do admire your energy and courage to continue posting here on your new thread. I would have kissed goodbye all this long ago without ever looking back! 

Are there any new results from your setup at the SA University?

Cheers,
B
Hi B.  Thanks for the kind words.  I know how you've been following this progress.  I want you to keep and eye out for lasersaber's new work and check out the work being done on the Joule Thief threads.  I'll send you a link to my own blog - when and if I get one.  Just not sure where I'll go next.  I'm afraid that the ego's and self-serving interests of those 'replicators' makes these forums pure poison.  But as they say - any publicity is good publicity.

Kind regards,
Rosemary.

Free Energy

ashtweth_nihilisti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 635
  • Open souce will free humanity
    • View Profile
    • WWW
    • Email
    • Personal Message (Online)
Your own blog is where you belong - Some where  that you cant distract or take advantage of the good will of open source engineers for your own agenda. Even not take advantage of Stefan.

Long overdue.

Ashtweth Palise

Free Energy

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1225
    • View Profile
    • Personal Message (Online)
Stefan is not stupid, the EF.com banned Rose cause of her behavior after being asked to take any personal crusades off the forum (which were nothing to do with us BTW) was ignored. Stefan also wants none of this nonessential blabber in this forum.

Mean time, we have all been doing open source work, at the EF.com and other things, no one needs or cares for any distractions of this kind. Stefan is not stupid Rose. Neither are Glen, Harvey, Aaron, myself and others you have dealt with who all say the same thing.
Thats the last post of this kind i am doing. I feel for Glen/Harvey and Aaron, they could of been light years ahead with their open source  work if they had not had to deal with this mess, i have been watching. Those who want to work, i suggest you display this trait now. Rose wont be doing this mess for much longer. I Have a lot of work to do BTW.

Ash

Ashtweth I am well aware of how hopelessly in love you are with Glen.  But the standards of Open Source require replications to be acknowledged as such.  One does not expect the outright theft of the technology that is then advanced.  You seem to have overlooked this.  Your judgement is, therefore highly suspect.  Not only that - but your general grasp of the facts seem to be lacking.  Glen, Harvey and You do not add up SIX people.  It is less than a majority either in a collaboration or in any context at all.  And Glen's loud and rather inarticulate demands to have this technology divorced from my own poor efforts - is excessively transparent - to everyone.  The difference is that there are those of you who apparently endorse that theft.

You have made an alarming judgement call.  Time will show you this.  And I am entirely satisfied that all three of you will be so utterly discredited that you will not be able to show your faces on any forums anywhere.  I may be systematically banned - but I will NEVER tire of promoting that something that I entirely understand.  And I intend progressing that understanding.  And may I assure you that you will NEVER be able to license this energy as you are hoping.  Steorne's application is absolutely NOT efficient - NOR patentable - no matter the weight of finance in support of it.  There is MUCH out there that shows considerably more promise.  And all of it ENTIRELY understandable and replicable and usable.  All that is needed is an increase in the power output. 

NOW.  You have not answered my question.  What will you do when we make public our results?  Will you STILL try to advise the world and it's wife that this is Glen's work?  And what will you do when the world and it's wife learn how EASY it is to generate their utility requirements away from your licensing authority?  Will you howl about injustice?  And tell me something Ashtweth.  How can either Glen or Harvey or for that matter you - promote something that they and you don't even understand?  Or if they/you understand it - then why are they/you not promoting that knowledge?  Scarey stuff here Ashtweth.

And B, if you're reading here - I have killed no-one.  This is the ONLY reason that these three horrors are trying to get our work out of the public eye. 
 

Hi All,

please add on your site a link to OverUnity.com

and get back great targeted traffic..

Please click here to go to
Link-Submit-Page

Many thanks in advance.
Regards, Stefan. (admin)

Page created in 0.175 seconds with 28 queries.