Free Energy

*
User Menu
movieclipsfree
movie clips free
Emergencyunit
Emergencyhelper
Statistics

  • *Total Posts: 255792
  • *Total Topics: 9053
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 18
  • *Guests: 130
  • *Spiders: 0
  • *Total: 148

cropcircles
*
Theme Selector
*
Renewable E.
Ecofun
SunPower
10 % Off
Great Hosting
*
Google Search

Author Topic: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder  (Read 41926 times)

poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1109
  • It's not as complicated as it may seem...
    • View Profile
    • Email
    • Personal Message (Offline)
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #795 on: November 07, 2010, 02:11:10 PM »
With all due respect happyfunball, you will find the same circuit outlined here in Fig 12a:
http://www.datasheetcatalog.org/datasheet/irf/irfpg50.pdf

That PDF has a date of 10/97.

However, The HEXFET Power MOSFET Designer's Manual HDM-3 of which I have in my library, has the exact same circuit and is dated September 1993.

My version is even older, and is before the IRFPG50 was born:

Power MOSFET HEXFET Databook, HDB-3, 1985. It does not seem to have the unclamped diagram in any of the spec sheets, but it does reference avalanche testing using essentially the same circuit as Fig. 12a. in the "Integral Body Diode" section, App note 934B, Fig. 23.

.99

Free Energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #795 on: November 07, 2010, 02:11:10 PM »
  • Reply with quoteQuote
Sponsored links:

ashtweth_nihilisti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 635
  • Open souce will free humanity
    • View Profile
    • WWW
    • Email
    • Personal Message (Online)
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #796 on: November 07, 2010, 02:24:30 PM »
All that happened in this whole saga is people did not listen to creditable hard workers in the open source community  and made a fool out of themselves. we know who you are now. I am glad this is over, we told you so, all as it did was unnecessary distract engineers from work.
now we can get on with the job with out the you know whats.

Ash

Free Energy

fuzzytomcat

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 350
  • Open Source Experimentalist
    • View Profile
    • Personal Message (Offline)
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #797 on: November 07, 2010, 11:02:26 PM »
Howdy reading members and guests,

Here is some information regarding the Quantum article ......... posted by Rosemary "in her own words" ......

********************************************************************************


http://www.energeticforum.com/59369-post262.html        Post #262            July 06, 2009

Quote

witsend 
Senior Member
        
TinselKoala - THE ONLY APPROPRIATE CIRCUIT DIAGRAM that I can assure you is correct is the diagram in the paper. And the flyback diode is a critical part of the system.

The circuit diagram in the Quantum article was prepared by Brian Buckley. I cannot comment on whether it is right or not as I simply cannot read it. I am hoping that Donovan will be able to comment in due course. I don't think he has even seen that article - as published.

But it is definitely required as without it we cannot 're-route' the collapsing fields back to the battery to recharge it.



TinselKoala - THE ONLY APPROPRIATE CIRCUIT DIAGRAM that I can assure you is correct is the diagram in the paper.

I cannot comment on whether it is right or not as I simply cannot read it.

And the flyback diode is a critical part of the system.



********************************************************************************

http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=13.msg1785#msg1785        Post #104         February 14, 2010

Quote

aetherevarising

The Quantum article was wholly written by myself. The Figures and tables were drafted for inclusion in that paper by Brian Buckley.  He is/was a technician who worked with me.  He made no other material contribution to the experiments, the design of the experiments or to any other aspect of the paper.  He is listed as 'author' as a courtesy only.  He is/was entirely unfamiliar with the objects of those tests except as they transpired - over time.


The Quantum article was wholly written by myself.



********************************************************************************


Quote from Rosemary ........ And the flyback diode is a critical part of the system.


My circuit does not contain a "flyback" diode at all ??
http://public.blu.livefilestore.com/y1pfvoNdCpu__35PC62cGfzW90ZPsG1xy3QrmQVUesS1ckth315xvW9rbRwYONssOu1bgEmgt6GZbuta6DvPWCGRA/Mosfet_Heater_Circuit_11-26-2009.bmp?psid=1


Regards,
Glen

Tenbatsu

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 20
    • View Profile
    • Personal Message (Offline)
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #798 on: November 07, 2010, 11:44:23 PM »
Fuzzytomcat, can you please refrain from using highlighted text. 

I'd be more inclined to read your posts if they were not so hard on the eyes.  Thank you.

Free Energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #798 on: November 07, 2010, 11:44:23 PM »
  • Reply with quoteQuote

nievesoliveras

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1708
    • View Profile
    • Email
    • Personal Message (Offline)
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #799 on: November 08, 2010, 12:16:41 AM »
I dont know but it seems that some people want that @rosemary be perfect.
Nobody in the whole world is perfect. Just let her be.

Jesus

truthbeknown

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 92
    • View Profile
    • Personal Message (Online)
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #800 on: November 08, 2010, 01:05:14 AM »
I dont know but it seems that some people want that @rosemary be perfect.
Nobody in the whole world is perfect. Just let her be.

Jesus

No one was or is expecting perfection Jesus, We just wanted the " WHOLE TRUTH" to be brought out FINALLY in the Open Forum. How would you feel if a so called inventor wanted you to make something, then purposely left out details and then turned on you  as soon as things didn't turn out the way she wanted. So a group of experimentalists WASTED 8 months or so of their precious time because they then start to get attacked when they tell her it really needs some further testing with some possible other test equipment. Then because her thesis paper couldn't get published she continued to attack the other authors ( a couple of them more so than others ) and EVEN THOUGH she finally found a TRADE SCHOOL  bunch of kids that are wanting to help her she then continues to bad mouth the previous group that tried to help. Even to the point where she continues to say she won't post any details of the resistor she is now using because people will steal it. Now does that truly sound like a person who is commited  to OPEN SOURCE TECHNOLOGY? Think about it.
So it would be to her benefit to just continue her TRADE SCHOOL research there locally to her and just quit bringing up the other guys names trying to accuse them of stealing and everything else. Go back and do some reading Jesus if you have the time. Go read the very first post in this thread. Did it follow through? Then read post #3 in this thread where she started her bad mouthing and it continued on from there.


J.
« Last Edit: November 08, 2010, 02:19:42 AM by truthbeknown »

Free Energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #800 on: November 08, 2010, 01:05:14 AM »
  • Reply with quoteQuote
Sponsored links:

nievesoliveras

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1708
    • View Profile
    • Email
    • Personal Message (Offline)
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #801 on: November 08, 2010, 01:15:51 AM »
You must know by now that women are very strange.
Usually if they speak soft is because they want something.
If they shout, is because they did not get it.

So even though she maybe not right, she deserves a respectful treatment.
Also she must be respectful back.

Jesus

Free Energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #801 on: November 08, 2010, 01:15:51 AM »
  • Reply with quoteQuote

ashtweth_nihilisti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 635
  • Open souce will free humanity
    • View Profile
    • WWW
    • Email
    • Personal Message (Online)
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #802 on: November 08, 2010, 03:46:21 AM »
Jesus dont try and understand the issue, if you cannot now, it has been spelled out that things she did were deliberate and made no sense, Glen has spelled it out in full color, 6 people have all testified to it, i am one of them, if you dont get it, dont comment, dont tell us to treat people normal, we do , and have tried numerous times to help Rose, thats the point of why we are pointing this all out. Every one who posted and didn't read made  a fool out of themselves. Right in front of the people who contribute, at least we got that out of this time wasting mess.

Ashtweth

Free Energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #802 on: November 08, 2010, 03:46:21 AM »
  • Reply with quoteQuote

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1225
    • View Profile
    • Personal Message (Online)
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #803 on: November 08, 2010, 03:41:29 PM »
AN OPEN LETTER TO STEFAN

Dear Stefan.

I have been hospitalised for nearly a week.  I come back to find my thread has been FLAMED - again - by Glen and all of it OFF TOPIC and this effort has been advanced by Glen and Harvey who CLAIM that I maligned them.  WHERE?  Glen CLAIMS that I have deleted 8 of his posts.  WHERE?????

When you invited me to post here you assured me that I would have moderator status as - without it - I will inevitably be 'attacked' by that 'gang' of unprincipled opportunists - and then I will be banned.  You have breached that agreement and withdrawn that moderator status and have invited GLEN AND HARVEY to start a thread in opposition to my own - which is working against this technology and is dedicated to wrecking my hard work on the thesis and on the applications.

I assure you that there are a large number of readers of my thread.  I know this as it entices an off forum discussion which is getting ever wider.  Why have you taken this stance against me?  Are you under an obligation to give them this license to prevent my advancing either the thesis or the application itself?  Am I becoming too effective?  Are you in league with them?  Certainly their need to silence me is now CLAMOROUS.  What exactly is your commitment to open source if you can allow this.

Please do not pretend that I can continue with any kind of work here if they are given the right as you have now given them - to destroy this thread and my hard work in advancing it.

The flaming that has now occurred co-incided with my efforts at discussing certain aspects of the thesis.  I am entirely satisfied that Harvey and Glen need to SILENCE ME.  Surely the evidence speaks for itself.  Why should they be so anxious to rake up an irrelevant HISTORY - when all I am trying to do is advance a really easy technology?  And for God's sake - LOOK AT THEIR WORK.  Look at EF.COM AND even what they've written on OU.COM.  There is ABSOLUTELY NO interest in taking this further.  If I am not allowed to report on this then it will be KILLED.  IS THAT WHAT YOU ALSO REQUIRE?  It certainly is NOT what I understood your commitment to be when you opened this thread for me.

And what exactly do you mean when you say that you are going to DELETE these threads?  Are you now going to delete this hard work.  Have you even read what you're planning to delete?

Regards,
Rosemary

Free Energy

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1225
    • View Profile
    • Personal Message (Online)
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #804 on: November 08, 2010, 03:55:01 PM »
Guys, I'm in receipt of correspondence from Stefan that I simply do not understand.  In the first instance I was simply giving due record of my thesis and the experimental evidence required to prove it.  Then Glen and Harvey both petitioned Stefan to open their own thread in opposition to my own.  Why?  I was doing them absolutely no harm.  I was not even referencing them.  But Glen's anxiety to find the spotlight can only be achieved by confronting me.  And both he and Harvey have some kind of agenda that is determined to SILENCE me.

It seems that it is working.  You see for yourself what happens when I'm sick.  God alone knows what would happen if I died.  All this knowledge would be BURIED with me.  I appeal to you all to ENTIRELY disregard those stupid - inarticulate - CLAMOROUS posts of Harvey, Glen and Ashtweth - and, IF I am banned as a result of this my PROTEST - then so be it.  What is going on here is abyssimal.  It is absolutely NOT in the interests of either OVER UNITY or FREE ENERGY or the advancement of either.  It is designed to protect that unsubstantiated claim that Glen has got something that is NOT a replication.  And it seems that Stefan is in agreement with their apparent complaints albeit without any substantiation whatsoever.

And it seems that for me to PROTEST the truth is also to be entirely at risk at progressing anything at all.  Certainly not even Stefan sees any need to offer me protection - despite the need being very evident.  In fact - there is now - apparently - the real possibility that all this work will be DELETED.  What the hell.  Where is the interests of Open Source.  What a parody of Open Source.

Regards,
Rosemary

Free Energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #804 on: November 08, 2010, 03:55:01 PM »
  • Reply with quoteQuote
Sponsored links:

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1225
    • View Profile
    • Personal Message (Online)
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #805 on: November 08, 2010, 04:18:39 PM »
And Stefan.  Ashtweth hints in that broad inarticulate way that he does that he's aware of the identity of Doozy2.  Tell us all, PLEASE how he was given this knowledge?

Regards,
Rosemary

Free Energy

ashtweth_nihilisti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 635
  • Open souce will free humanity
    • View Profile
    • WWW
    • Email
    • Personal Message (Online)
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #806 on: November 08, 2010, 04:21:40 PM »
The gig is LONG up Rose, dont distract people any more and leave us get on with the work we are doing.
i am sure you will be banned if you dont take this hint.

Ashtweth Palise
Panacea founder

Free Energy

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1225
    • View Profile
    • Personal Message (Online)
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #807 on: November 08, 2010, 04:24:31 PM »
The gig is LONG up Rose, dont distract people any more and leave us get on with the work we are doing.
i am sure you will be banned if you dont take this hint.

Ashtweth Palise
Panacea founder

WHAT GIG?  WHAT ARE YOU HINTING HERE ASHTWETH?  IF YOU HAVE SOMETHING TO SAY - THEN SAY IT.

And I am entirely satisfied that you would LOVE to have me banned.  God knows how hard you all worked on this at EF.COM.  And it seems that you've perfected the recipe.  All you do is wait for the moment - FLAME the threads - not even articulate sensible posts - then then sit back like a pack of carion and pick the bones clean.

History will speak very loudly here Ashtweth - that I promise you.  And I have every reason to believe that you will regret this extraordinary attack you head against us poor inventors.  Especially those of us who are female.  LOL

R

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1225
    • View Profile
    • Personal Message (Online)
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #808 on: November 08, 2010, 05:04:41 PM »
Jesus dont try and understand the issue, if you cannot now, it has been spelled out that things she did were deliberate and made no sense, Glen has spelled it out in full color, 6 people have all testified to it, i am one of them, if you dont get it, dont comment, dont tell us to treat people normal, we do , and have tried numerous times to help Rose, thats the point of why we are pointing this all out. Every one who posted and didn't read made  a fool out of themselves. Right in front of the people who contribute, at least we got that out of this time wasting mess.

Ashtweth

I missed this one.  There are NOT 6 OF YOU.  There is you - Glen and Harvey.  Steve has NOTHING to say either in defense or against me.  Effectively there are 3 of you and all three are anxious to prevent this technology rather than advance it.  I need to know - we ALL need to know why?  No-one comes out and says it but the fact is that you all HINT.  You are trying to pretend that this is Glen's technology.

The truth of the matter is that we will be downloading data and data and more data that will show how easy this is to replicate.  We've already achieved amazing results on that almost 'STANDARD' immersion heater.  And that's not even close to our best.  That's why it has now become critical to flame this thread and GET RID OF me - come hell or high water. 

Worst still, for you all, is the knowledge that the thesis is now being seriously considered.  And that by academics.  Now tell me Ashtweth.  Why this frantic need to flame this thread?  Why is it now IMPERATIVE that you, Glen, Harvey, TK, Truthbeknown - and all of you? why NOW?  Why suddenly has it become a do or die that you get rid of me?  I think we'd all like to know.  I think we all need to understand what it is about this technology that is DIFFERENT in Glen's replication to those multiple replications that we have/will achieve?  Harvey has mouthed sundry platitudes about the need for a replication to reach COP>17.  Strangely Glen exceeded this.  So did we.  The only person who got hooked on that number was Aaron- and that, because it was the conservative evaluation over an experiment conducted over time.  And the time was only determined by the time it took the control to run FLAT.   Indeed there were multiple moments on all experiments where the evidence is that the battery gets recharged.  That cannot happen at COP>17. 

The other distinction is the difference in the resistors.  I will show you this same effect on resistors that are both standard and non-standard.  The only difference is their point of resonance.  Nothing exotic Ashtweth.  It's absolutely - as day follows night - an easy thing to get.  If you never managed a replication - then I'm not sure why.  We did it on our first test at campus.  I would have downloaded it if I had the right scopemeter to do so.

Rosemary

Free Energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #808 on: November 08, 2010, 05:04:41 PM »
  • Reply with quoteQuote

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1225
    • View Profile
    • Personal Message (Online)
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #809 on: November 08, 2010, 05:14:47 PM »
What really puzzles me is that you see this imperative requirement to divorce these results from my efforts or thesis.  I wonder if it is because you've INVESTED in Steorne's work and would rather prefer to advance that.  Like you've got a right to rewrite history as per Ashtweth's preference.  And this because you understand so much about physics.  Or is it because it's easier to hit at old women than it is to band together as 'men' as you seem to see it.  In truth, MEN don't behave as you do.  MEN are actually honourable and don't spend their time trying to gag women.  MEN are prepared to acknowledge that women can make as strong a contribution to science as men - because they can also think - and create - and analyse.  And MEN would not, as a rule, have difficulty in acknowledging talent - be it among men or women.

You have all gone to some considerable trouble to try and paint me stupid.  Feel free.  Those MEN out there who matter are not so inclined to share your opinion.  And the THREE of you are absolutely NOT representative of MEN.  MEN absolutely DO NOT BASH OLD WOMEN for doing nothing more nor less than standing up for the truth.

Rosemary
 

Hi All,

please add on your site a link to OverUnity.com

and get back great targeted traffic..

Please click here to go to
Link-Submit-Page

Many thanks in advance.
Regards, Stefan. (admin)

Page created in 0.154 seconds with 28 queries.